CONTINUOUS SPINAL-ANESTHESIA WITH HYPERBARIC BUPIVACAINE - A DOSE-RESPONSE ANALYSIS

被引:0
|
作者
BURGESS, FW
WOIWOOD, MD
LUTZ, RL
WALZ, EJ
PERKINS, DE
机构
关键词
ANESTHESIA; ANESTHETIC TECHNIQUE; SPINAL; CONTINUOUS; BUPIVACAINE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Continuous spinal anesthesia (CSA) with hyperbaric bupivacaine (0.75% bupivacaine in 8.25% dextrose and water) was administered to 27 adult males for transurethral endoscopic surgery. Patients were randomized to receive either 3.75, 7.5 or 10 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine in a double-blind fashion. A 20-gauge nylon catheter was inserted at the L3-4 interspace, via an 18-gauge Tuohy-Schliff needle, extending only 2 cm into the subarachnoid space. All patients were placed in the lithotomy position prior to administration of the hyperbaric bupivacaine. Sensory block was assessed by pinprick and perception of a 50-Hz tetanic stimulus at 5, 10 and 20 minutes, then every 20 minutes thereafter. Peak sensory and motor block were obtained by 20 minutes for all dose ranges. Peak sensory levels were T7.1, T5.6 and T3.9 for 3.75, 7.5 and 10 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine, respectively. Linear regression analysis demonstrated a significant correlation (r = 0.68) between peak sensory level and dose of bupivacaine. Peak sensory level as estimated by pinprick and 50-Hz tetanic stimulus showed excellent correlation (r = 0.99). The role of the subarachnoid catheter in the dispersion and distribution of bupivacaine within the subarachnoid space was studied in a model spinal canal system and compared with the distribution of bupivacaine administered via a standard 25-gauge spinal needle. No significant differences were found in the distribution of bupivacaine with either method of injection. The distribution of hyperbaric bupivacaine within the subarachnoid space appears to be related to baricity but is unrelated to administration via needle or catheter.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 56
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] COMPARISON OF HYPOBARIC, HYPERBARIC, AND ISOBARIC SOLUTIONS OF BUPIVACAINE DURING CONTINUOUS SPINAL-ANESTHESIA
    VANGESSEL, EF
    FORSTER, A
    SCHWEIZER, A
    GAMULIN, Z
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1991, 72 (06) : 779 - 784
  • [2] HIGH-VOLUME SPINAL-ANESTHESIA - A DOSE-RESPONSE STUDY OF BUPIVACAINE 0.125-PERCENT
    TAY, DHB
    TAY, SM
    THOMAS, E
    ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 1992, 20 (04) : 443 - 447
  • [3] COMPARISON OF HYPERBARIC SOLUTIONS OF BUPIVACAINE AND TETRACAINE DURING CONTINUOUS SPINAL-ANESTHESIA
    VANGESSEL, EF
    MIEGE, B
    FORSTER, A
    SALVAJ, G
    FATHI, M
    GAMULIN, Z
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1992, 39 (04): : 323 - 329
  • [4] SPINAL-ANESTHESIA FOR CESAREAN DELIVERY - A COMPARISON OF 2 DOSES OF HYPERBARIC BUPIVACAINE
    DESIMONE, CA
    LEIGHTON, BL
    NORRIS, MC
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA, 1995, 20 (02) : 90 - 94
  • [5] Dose-response characteristics of spinal bupivacaine in volunteers: Clinical implications for ambulatory anesthesia
    Liu, SS
    Ware, PD
    Allen, HW
    Neal, JM
    Pollock, JE
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1996, 85 (04) : 729 - 736
  • [6] CONTINUOUS SPINAL-ANESTHESIA - DOES LOW-DOSE PLAIN OR HYPERBARIC BUPIVACAINE ALLOW THE PERFORMANCE OF HIP-SURGERY IN THE ELDERLY
    BIBOULET, P
    VACHER, E
    DESCHODT, J
    CHAUVET, P
    AUBAS, P
    DATHIS, F
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA, 1993, 18 (03) : 170 - 175
  • [7] CONTINUOUS SPINAL-ANESTHESIA - DOSE REQUIREMENTS AND CHARACTERISTICS OF THE BLOCK
    PETROS, AJ
    BARNARD, M
    SMITH, D
    RONZONI, G
    CARLI, F
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA, 1993, 18 (01) : 52 - 54
  • [8] PREDICTION OF THE SPREAD OF REPEATED SPINAL-ANESTHESIA WITH BUPIVACAINE
    TUOMINEN, M
    PITKANEN, M
    TAIVAINEN, T
    ROSENBERG, PH
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1992, 68 (02) : 136 - 138
  • [9] COMPLICATIONS OF CONTINUOUS SPINAL-ANESTHESIA
    PEYTON, PJ
    ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 1992, 20 (04) : 417 - 425
  • [10] A low dose of plain or hyperbaric bupivacaine for unilateral spinal anesthesia
    Kuusniemi, KS
    Pihlajamäki, KK
    Pitkänen, MT
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2000, 25 (06) : 605 - 610