Where do patients known to a community palliative care service die?

被引:10
作者
Capel, Margred [1 ]
Gazi, Terri [1 ]
Vout, Lauren [2 ]
Wilson, Nicola [1 ]
Finlay, Ilora [3 ]
机构
[1] George Thomas Hosp Care, Ty George Thomas,Whitchurch Hosp Grounds,Pk Rd, Cardiff CF14 7BQ, Wales
[2] Cardiff Univ, Sch Med, Cardiff, Wales
[3] Velindre Hosp, Dept Palliat Med, Cardiff, Wales
关键词
D O I
10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000097
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives The majority of people would prefer to die at home and National Health Service policy aims to support this concept. This service evaluation compared the preferred and actual place of death of patients known to a specialist community palliative care service. Design All deaths of patients (n=788) known to the specialist palliative care service from 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2010 were examined in a service evaluation to compare the actual place of death with the preferred place of death previously identified by the patient. Triggers for admission were established when patients did not achieve this preference. Results 69% of patients (n=263) who expressed a preference to die at home and 82% of patients (n=93) who expressed a preference to die as inpatients in the hospice fulfilled these preferences. 71% of patients (n=298) who wanted to die in their current place of residence achieved this preference. 54% of patients (n=121) who declined to express a preference for end-of-life care subsequently died in hospital, reflecting the importance of advance care planning. Conclusions The perceived lack of social support for patients dying at home is a significant trigger for admission to a hospice. The provision of sitters to support patients dying at home may ensure people achieve their preference. Commissioners consider preferred place of care to be a marker of quality, but clinical events that precipitate admission are often outside the influence of the palliative care team.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 47
页数:5
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Transitions between care settings at the end of life in The Netherlands: results from a nationwide study
    Abarshi, Ebun
    Echteld, Michael
    Van den Block, Lieve
    Donker, Ge
    Deliens, Luc
    Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Bregje
    [J]. PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2010, 24 (02) : 166 - 174
  • [2] End-of-life care in hospital: a descriptive study of all inpatient deaths in 1 year
    Abel, J.
    Rich, A.
    Griffin, T.
    Purdy, S.
    [J]. PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2009, 23 (07) : 616 - 622
  • [3] Preference for place of care and place of death in palliative care: are these different questions?
    Agar, M.
    Currow, D. C.
    Shelby-James, T. M.
    Plummer, J.
    Sanderson, C.
    Abernethy, A. P.
    [J]. PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2008, 22 (07) : 787 - 795
  • [4] Place of death: hospital-based advanced home care versus conventional care - A prospective study in palliative cancer care
    Ahlner-Elmqvist, M
    Jordhoy, MS
    Jannert, M
    Fayers, P
    Kaasa, S
    [J]. PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2004, 18 (07) : 585 - 593
  • [5] [Anonymous], PALLIATIVE CARE WALE
  • [6] Clinical findings and recommendations made during home visits by a palliative care specialist physician
    Bush, S. H.
    Wearne, H. J.
    Reilly, P. E.
    Chacko, R.
    Palmer, J. L.
    [J]. PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2009, 23 (07) : 635 - 641
  • [7] Outcome of referrals to a community palliative care service: where do patients die?
    Capel, Margred
    Gazi, Terri
    Finlay, Ilora
    [J]. CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2011, 11 (04) : 412 - 413
  • [8] How is place of death from cancer changing and what affects it? Analysis of cancer registration and service data
    Davies, E.
    Linklater, K. M.
    Jack, R. H.
    Clark, L.
    Moller, H.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2006, 95 (05) : 593 - 600
  • [9] Department of Health, END OF LIF CAR STRAT
  • [10] Achieving the preferred place of care for hospitalized patients at the end of life
    Gerrard, Ruth
    Campbell, Janet
    Minton, Ollie
    Moback, Berit
    Skinner, Charles
    McGowan, Catherine
    Stone, Patrick Charles
    [J]. PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2011, 25 (04) : 333 - 336