THEORETICAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR A MEANINGFUL CODE OF PROFESSIONAL ETHICS

被引:70
作者
JAMAL, K [1 ]
BOWIE, NE [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV MINNESOTA,STRATEG MANAGEMENT & ORG,MINNEAPOLIS,MN 55455
关键词
D O I
10.1007/BF00872324
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The professions have focused considerable attention on developing codes of conduct. Despite their efforts there is considerable controversy regarding the propriety of professional codes of ethics. Many provisions of professional codes seem to exacerbate disputes between the profession and the public rather than providing a framework that satisfies the public's desire for moral behavior. After examining three professional codes, we divide the provisions of professional codes into those provisions which urge professionals to avoid moral hazard, maintain professional courtesy and serve the public interest. We note that whereas provisions urging the avoidance of moral hazard are uncontroversial, the public is suspicious of provisions protecting professional courtesy. Public interest provisions are controversial when the public and the profession disagree as to what is in the public interest. Based on these observations, we conclude with recommendations regarding the content of professional codes.
引用
收藏
页码:703 / 714
页数:12
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]  
BAYLES M, BUSINESS PROFESSIONA, V5, P26
[2]  
Beauchamp Tom L, 1992, Bus Prof Ethics J, V11, P5
[3]  
DAVIS M, 1991, J COLLEGE U LAW, V18, P207
[4]  
GERSON A, 1980, LAWYERS ETHICS CONT, P145
[5]  
GOLDMAN A, 1980, MORAL F PROFESSIONAL
[6]  
Kultgen, 1982, BUSINESS PROFESSIONA, V1, P53
[7]  
Ladd J., 1980, AAAS PROFESSIONAL ET, P154
[8]  
Pasinetti L. L., 1987, NEW PALGRAVE DICT EC