PHASE-II TRIAL OF CARBOPLATIN AND ETOPOSIDE IN METASTATIC BREAST-CANCER

被引:0
作者
CROWN, J
HAKES, T
REICHMAN, B
LEBWOHL, D
GILEWSKI, T
SURBONE, A
CURRIE, V
YAO, TJ
HUDIS, C
SEIDMAN, A
NORTON, L
机构
[1] Gynecologic Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
关键词
METASTATIC BREAST CANCER; CARBOPLATIN; ETOPOSIDE;
D O I
10.1002/1097-0142(19930215)71:4<1254::AID-CNCR2820710414>3.0.CO;2-X
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background. High-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic support produces high rates of response in metastatic breast cancer. To facilitate new high-dose regimens there is a need to identify active agents with toxicity limited to hematopoietic suppression. Cisplatin/etoposide is a highly active regimen in metastatic breast cancer, but cisplatin dose-escalation is limited by nonhematologic toxicity. Carboplatin is active in breast cancer and has marrow-dominant toxicity. Demonstration of activity for the combination of carboplatin and etoposide would facilitate their inclusion in high-dose programs. Methods. A single treatment arm prospective Phase II study in patients with measurable or evaluable breast cancer was done. Results. Forty-six patients with metastatic breast cancer were treated with the combination of carboplatin and etoposide. Among 19 patients without prior chemotherapy, one complete and seven partial responses were observed, for an objective response rate of 42% (95% exact confidence intervals [CI], 20-67%). One partial response was seen among 12 patients with prior chemotherapy limited to the adjuvant setting. No responses were seen among 14 patients who had received prior chemotherapy for metastatic cancer. Two treatment-related deaths occurred, both attributable to sepsis. One patient returned to her community for treatment after receiving one course of protocol therapy before response assessment and could not be studied for response. Conclusion. The activity observed with this regimen in patients with no prior chemotherapy coupled with its potential for dose escalation suggests a possible role in high-dose programs with hematopoietic support. The inactivity of the combination in patients with prior therapy for metastatic breast cancer indicates that there is no advantage to its use in the salvage setting.
引用
收藏
页码:1254 / 1257
页数:4
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   A NOVEL PHARMACODYNAMICALLY BASED APPROACH TO DOSE OPTIMIZATION OF CARBOPLATIN WHEN USED IN COMBINATION WITH ETOPOSIDE [J].
BELANI, CP ;
EGORIN, MJ ;
ABRAMS, JS ;
HIPONIA, D ;
EISENBERGER, M ;
AISNER, J ;
VANECHO, DA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1989, 7 (12) :1896-1902
[2]  
CARMOPEREIRA J, 1989, 5TH P EUR C CLIN ONC
[3]   CISPLATIN AND ETOPOSIDE AS 1ST-LINE CHEMOTHERAPY FOR METASTATIC BREAST-CARCINOMA - A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF THE ITALIAN ONCOLOGY GROUP FOR CLINICAL RESEARCH [J].
COCCONI, G ;
BISAGNI, G ;
BACCHI, M ;
BONI, C ;
BARTOLUCCI, R ;
CECI, G ;
COLOZZA, MA ;
DELISI, V ;
LOTTICI, R ;
MOSCONI, AM ;
PASSALACQUA, R ;
TONATO, M .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1991, 9 (04) :664-669
[4]   TREATMENT OF ESTROGEN RECEPTOR-NEGATIVE OR HORMONALLY REFRACTORY BREAST-CANCER WITH DOUBLE HIGH-DOSE CHEMOTHERAPY INTENSIFICATION AND BONE-MARROW SUPPORT [J].
DUNPHY, FR ;
SPITZER, G ;
BUZDAR, AU ;
HORTOBAGYI, GN ;
HORWITZ, LJ ;
YAU, JC ;
SPINOLO, JA ;
JAGANNATH, S ;
HOLMES, F ;
WALLERSTEIN, RO ;
BOHANNAN, PA ;
DICKE, KA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1990, 8 (07) :1207-1216
[5]   CISPLATIN IN THE TREATMENT OF METASTATIC BREAST-CARCINOMA - A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF 2 DOSAGE SCHEDULES [J].
FORASTIERE, AA ;
HAKES, TB ;
WITTES, JT ;
WITTES, RE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 1982, 5 (03) :243-247
[6]   THE IMPORTANCE OF DOSE INTENSITY IN CHEMOTHERAPY OF METASTATIC BREAST-CANCER [J].
HRYNIUK, W ;
BUSH, H .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1984, 2 (11) :1281-1288
[8]   CARBOPLATIN ACTIVITY IN UNTREATED METASTATIC BREAST-CANCER PATIENTS - RESULTS OF A PHASE-II STUDY [J].
KOLARIC, K ;
VUKAS, D .
CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 1991, 27 (05) :409-412
[9]  
KRITZ A, 1991, BLOOD S, V78, P19
[10]  
MARTIN M, 1991, SEMIN ONCOL, V18, P23