Experimental Economics, Game Theory and Das Adam Smith Problem

被引:1
作者
Witztum, Amos [1 ]
机构
[1] London Sch Econ, CPNSS, Houghton St, London WC2A 2AE, England
关键词
Adam Smith; experimental economics; human sociality;
D O I
10.1057/s41302-016-0006-9
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Experimental economics challenges the mainstream by arguing that only social rational agents will produce a socially desirable outcome in competitive interactions. However, the solution of Das Adam Smith Problem provided neo-classical economics with its own cover: self-interested people can be socially minded and only among ethical self-interested agents will competitive interaction succeed. I will challenge both assertions in this paper. I will argue that what experimental economists would call as social may not be such and that socially minded individuals are not likely to be the self-interested agent depicted by neo-classical economics.
引用
收藏
页码:528 / 556
页数:29
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] WHY FREE RIDE - STRATEGIES AND LEARNING IN PUBLIC-GOODS EXPERIMENTS
    ANDREONI, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 1988, 37 (03) : 291 - 304
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1822, THEORY MORAL SENTIME
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1976, INQUIRY NATURE CAUSE
  • [4] Arrow K., 1971, GEN COMPETITIVE ANAL
  • [5] Adam Smith, behavioral economist
    Ashraf, N
    Camerer, CF
    Loewenstein, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2005, 19 (03) : 131 - 145
  • [6] Binmore Ken, 2012, PLAYING FOR REAL
  • [7] Bowles S, 2011, COOPERATIVE SPECIES: HUMAN RECIPROCITY AND ITS EVOLUTION, P1
  • [8] Brown V, 2011, ADAM SMITH REV, V6, P172
  • [9] Brown Vivienne, 2009, ELGAR COMPANION A SM, P52
  • [10] Do Anglo-Saxons free-ride more?
    Burlando, R
    Hey, JD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 1997, 64 (01) : 41 - 60