The relationships between quality, innovation and business performance: an empirical study

被引:21
作者
Prajogo, Daniel I. [1 ]
Ahmed, Pervaiz K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Dept Management, Caulfield, Vic 3145, Australia
[2] Monash Univ Malaysia, Business Sch, Management, Kelana Jaya 46780, Selangor Darul, Malaysia
关键词
quality; innovation; product; process; business performance;
D O I
10.1504/IJBPM.2007.013361
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper examines the relationship between product quality, product innovation and process innovation, and the relationship between these three operational performance measures and business performance in terms of sales, profitability and market share. The impetus for this study was driven by an argument that propounds quality and innovation are two elements that compete with each other, and that firms need to make a trade-off decision between them. In conjunction with this, another argument suggests that quality is increasingly being 'downgraded' into an order qualifier criteria and innovation is taking over as the order winner. Using empirical data drawn from 194 managers in Australian firms, the results indicate that there are strong and positive relationships between product quality and process innovation. Similar relationships also occur between product innovation and process innovation. However, the relationship between product quality and product innovation appears to be relatively weak, especially with respect to specific elements. Further to this, the results indicate that process innovation shows strongest relationship with business performance, followed by product innovation and product quality. At the surface level, this finding provides support for the above argument that quality is relatively inferior in its impact on business performance compared to innovation.
引用
收藏
页码:380 / 405
页数:26
相关论文
共 94 条
[1]  
ABERNATHY WJ, 1988, READINGS MANAGEMENT, P55
[2]  
Adam J. E. E., 1994, J OPERATIONS MANAGEM, V12, P27, DOI DOI 10.1016/0272-6963(94)90004-3
[3]   Development and validation of TQM implementation constructs [J].
Ahire, SL ;
Golhar, DY ;
Waller, MA .
DECISION SCIENCES, 1996, 27 (01) :23-56
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1994, COMPETING FUTURE
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2005, FINANC EXECUTIVE, V21, P11
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1996, INT J QUALITY SCI
[7]  
[Anonymous], INT J COMMER MANAG
[8]   Market orientation and innovation [J].
AtuaheneGima, K .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 1996, 35 (02) :93-103
[9]   Business strategies in more- and less-innovative firms in Canada [J].
Baldwin, JR ;
Johnson, J .
RESEARCH POLICY, 1996, 25 (05) :785-804
[10]   THE EFFECT OF INTRODUCING IMPORTANT INCREMENTAL INNOVATIONS ON MARKET SHARE AND BUSINESS SURVIVAL [J].
BANBURY, CM ;
MITCHELL, W .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1995, 16 :161-182