Guidance on tiered risk assessment for plant protection products for aquatic organisms in edge-of-field surface waters

被引:570
作者
Aagaard, Alf [1 ]
Brock, Theo [1 ]
Capri, Ettore [1 ]
Duquesne, Sabine [1 ]
Filipic, Metka [1 ]
Hernandez-Jerez, Antonio F. [1 ]
Hirsch-Ernst, Karen I. [1 ]
Bennekou, Susanne Hougaard [1 ]
Klein, Michael [1 ]
Kuhl, Thomas [1 ]
Laskowski, Ryszard [1 ]
Liess, Matthias [1 ]
Mantovani, Alberto [1 ]
Ockleford, Colin [1 ]
Ossendorp, Bernadette [1 ]
Pickford, Daniel [1 ]
Smith, Robert [1 ]
Sousa, Paulo [1 ]
Sundh, Ingvar [1 ]
Tiktak, Aaldrik [1 ]
Van der Linden, Ton [1 ]
机构
[1] EFSA, Parma, Italy
关键词
pesticides; formulations; metabolites; ecotoxicology; aquatic organisms; specific protection goals; regulatory acceptable concentrations;
D O I
10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3290
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
EFSA`s Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR) was tasked to revise the Guidance Document (GD) on Aquatic Ecotoxicology under Council Directive 91/414/EEC (SANCO/3268/2001 rev. 4 (final), 17 October 2002). This Guidance of the PPR Panel is the first of three requested deliverables within this mandate. It has its focus on tiered acute and chronic effect assessment schemes with detailed guidance on tier 1 and higher tier effect assessments for aquatic organisms in edge-of-field surface waters and on proposals regarding how to link effects to exposure estimates. The exposure assessment methodology was not reviewed and it is assumed that the current FOCUS surface water exposure assessment methodology will continue to be used for exposure assessment at EU level. The current GD is intended to be used for authorisation of active substances at EU level as well as for plant protection products at Member State level. The effect assessment schemes in this GD allow for the derivation of regulatory acceptable concentrations (RACs) on the basis of two options: (1) the ecological threshold option (ETO), accepting negligible population effects only, and (2) the ecological recovery option (ERO), accepting some population-level effects if ecological recovery takes place within an acceptable time period. In the tiered effect assessment schemes, in principle, all tiers (1, 2 and 3) are able to address the ETO, while the model ecosystem approach (tier 3), under certain conditions, is able to also address the ERO. The GD provides the scientific background for the risk assessment to aquatic organisms in edge-of-field surface waters and is structured to give detailed guidance on all assessment steps. An executive summary joining all parts of the guidance and decision schemes in a concise way is provided and is intended to help applicants and regulatory authorities in day-to-day use. (C) European Food Safety Authority, 2013.
引用
收藏
页数:268
相关论文
共 282 条
[2]  
Adriaanse PI, 2009, 101 WOT
[3]   Uncertainty of the hazardous concentration and fraction affected for normal species sensitivity distributions [J].
Aldenberg, T ;
Jaworska, JS .
ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY, 2000, 46 (01) :1-18
[4]  
Aldenberg T, 2002, ENVIRON ECOL RISK AS, P49
[5]  
Aldrich AP, 2009, AGRARFORSCHUNG, V16, P466
[6]   Scientific Opinion on the hazard assessment of endocrine disruptors: Scientific criteria for identification of endocrine disruptors and appropriateness of existing test methods for assessing effects mediated by these substances on human health and the environment [J].
Alexander, Jan ;
Benford, Diane ;
Chaudhry, Qasim ;
Hardy, Anthony ;
Jeger, Michael John ;
Luttik, Robert ;
Martin, Ambroise ;
Ossendorp, Bernadette ;
More, Simon ;
Mortensen, Alicja ;
Noerrung, Birgit ;
Perry, Joe ;
Pratt, Iona ;
Sofos, John ;
Schlatter, Josef ;
Sejrsen, Kristen .
EFSA JOURNAL, 2013, 11 (03)
[7]   Scientific Opinion on outline proposals for assessment of exposure of organisms to substances in soil EFSA Panel of the Plant Protection Products and their Residues [J].
Alix, Anne ;
Boesten, Jos ;
Bolognesi, Claudia ;
Brock, Theo ;
Capri, Ettore ;
Hardy, Anthony ;
Hart, Andrew ;
Hirsch-Ernst, Karen ;
Hougaard-Bennekou, Susanne ;
Luttik, Robert ;
Moretto, Angelo ;
Ossendorp, Bernadette ;
Petersen, Annette ;
Pico, Yolanda ;
Schaeffer, Andreas ;
Sousa, Paulo ;
Steurbaut, Walter ;
Storemberg, Anita ;
Tasheva, Maria ;
van der Linden, Ton ;
Vleminckx, Christiane .
EFSA JOURNAL, 2010, 8 (01)
[8]  
Altenburger R, 2012, FKZ370965404 UMW DES
[9]   Statistical considerations for the safety evaluation of GMOs [J].
Andersson, Hans Christer ;
Arpaia, Salvatore ;
Bartsch, Detlef ;
Casacuberta, Josep ;
Davies, Howard ;
Herman, Lieve ;
Du Jardin, Patrick ;
Hendriksen, Niels ;
Kaerenlampi, Sirpa ;
Kiss, Jozsef ;
Kleter, Gijs ;
Kryspin-Sorensen, Ilona ;
Kuiper, Harry ;
Nes, Ingolf ;
Panopoulos, Nickolas ;
Perry, Joe ;
Poeting, Annette ;
Schiemann, Joachim ;
Seinen, Willem ;
Sweet, Jeremy ;
Wal, Jean-Michel .
EFSA JOURNAL, 2010, 8 (02)
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2010, EFSA J, V8, DOI 10.2903/j.efsa.2009.1438