BONE LOSS IN NORMAL BRITISH WOMEN - A 5-YEAR FOLLOW-UP

被引:9
|
作者
CLEMENTS, D
COMPSTON, JE
EVANS, C
EVANS, WD
机构
[1] UNIV HOSP WALES, DEPT RADIOL, CARDIFF CF4 4XW, WALES
[2] UNIV HOSP WALES, DEPT MED PHYS, CARDIFF CF4 4XW, WALES
来源
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY | 1993年 / 66卷 / 792期
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
D O I
10.1259/0007-1285-66-792-1134
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
To assess the rates of loss, forearm and spinal bone mineral were remeasured in 16 out of 18 peri- and postmenopausal women aged 45 to 60 years who had taken part in a previously reported cross-sectional study. The mean interval between measurements was 4.8 years (range 4.2-5.3 years). The mean (95% confidence interval (CI)) annual change in radial bone mineral density was -0.78%/year (-1.73 to +0.18%; not significant) and in spinal bone mineral -2.41%/year (-3.55 to 1.27%; p < 0.001). There was considerable variation in the rate of change in radius and spine, and between individuals. There was no significant correlation between rates of bone loss at either site, or between rates of loss and the initial bone density at either the radius or spine. There was no significant correlation between the rates of change and the age or number of years post-menopause of the women. There was no significant change in the Z score for the forearm (mean -0.20; 95% CI -0.65 to +0.25) or for the spine (mean -0.04; 95% CI -0.30 to +0.22). There have been no previous longitudinal studies of the changes of bone density in normal British women. These results show considerable variation between individuals, and rates of change at one site cannot be predicted from measurements at another site. Untreated, some normal individuals have high rates of loss that cannot be predicted from baseline values, age or number of years post-menopause.
引用
收藏
页码:1134 / 1137
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Laparoscopic fundoplication: 5-year follow-up - Discussion
    Laws, HL
    Serafini, F
    Dassinger, S
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2004, 70 (08) : 694 - 695
  • [32] LARYNGOTRACHEAL RECONSTRUCTION IN CHILDREN - 5-YEAR FOLLOW-UP
    COTTON, RT
    EVANS, JNG
    ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 1981, 90 (05): : 516 - 520
  • [33] FRACTURES IN PEOPLE WITH DIZZINESS: 5-YEAR FOLLOW-UP
    Beckman, Anders
    Hansson, Eva Ekvall
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2011, 59 (09) : 1767 - 1769
  • [34] OVARIAN MESENCHYMOMAS - A 5-YEAR FOLLOW-UP STUDY
    DIDDLE, AW
    DEVEREUX, WP
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1959, 13 (03): : 294 - 298
  • [35] TRICHINOSIS - 5-YEAR SEROLOGIC AND CLINICAL FOLLOW-UP
    COX, PM
    SCHULTZ, MG
    KAGAN, IG
    PREIZLER, J
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1969, 89 (06) : 651 - &
  • [36] MELANOMA TUMOR VACCINE - 5-YEAR FOLLOW-UP
    MCGEE, JMC
    LYTLE, GH
    MALNAR, KF
    PRICE, JA
    HUMPHREY, LJ
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 1991, 47 (04) : 233 - 238
  • [37] 5-YEAR FOLLOW-UP OF TMJ ARTHROSCOPIC SURGERY
    GOEHRING, DP
    DOLT, AH
    MONTGOMERY, MT
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1995, 74 : 172 - 172
  • [38] A 5-year follow-up study of suicide attempts
    Fridell, EJ
    Ojehagen, A
    TraskmanBendz, L
    ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, 1996, 93 (03) : 151 - 157
  • [39] Social support and functioning at 5-year follow-up
    Norman, Ross M. G.
    Windell, Deborah
    Manchanda, Rahul
    Hassall, Lori
    Harricharan, Raj
    Northcott, Sandra
    EARLY INTERVENTION IN PSYCHIATRY, 2012, 6 : 35 - 35
  • [40] 5-YEAR FOLLOW-UP OF ANKLE JOINT FUSIONS
    WALKER, JAL
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1956, 38 (04): : 926 - 926