Rethinking Knowledge Sharing Barriers: A Content Analysis of 103 Studies

被引:34
作者
Cleveland, Simon [1 ]
Ellis, Timothy J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Nova Southeastern Univ, Grad Sch Comp & Informat Sci, Ft Lauderdale, FL 33314 USA
关键词
Information Foraging Theory; Knowledge Contributing; Knowledge Seeking; Knowledge Sharing Barriers; Lack of Time; Lack of Trust; Locus of Control; Poor Communication; Role Ambiguity; Role Conflict; Social Exchange Theory;
D O I
10.4018/IJKM.2015010102
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The current work force will not only lose 3.6 million "baby boomers" by 2020, but also a substantial organizational knowledge. Presently, there is a gap in understanding how to promote effective organizational knowledge sharing due to the limited awareness of factors that inhibit knowledge sharing behaviors. The focus of this article is to explore the most commonly noted barriers to employees' knowledge seeking and knowledge contributing practices and extract potential factors that influence these barriers. A content analysis study is performed on 103 knowledge management articles from ten computer and information science databases. The results demonstrate a clear division between the barriers limiting each specific behavior: knowledge seeking behaviors depend largely on the time availability of knowledge seekers, while poor communication skills and lack of trust appear to be the major inhibitors to knowledge contribution. Three main factors were found to influence these barriers: role conflict, role ambiguity and locus of control. The findings are consistent with the information foraging and social exchange theories. Implications for future research are proposed.
引用
收藏
页码:28 / 51
页数:24
相关论文
共 109 条
[1]   Nurturing interpersonal trust in knowledge-sharing networks [J].
Abrams, LC ;
Cross, R ;
Lesser, E ;
Levin, DZ .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT EXECUTIVE, 2003, 17 (04) :64-77
[2]   Traditional, interpretive, and reception based content analyses: Improving the ability of content analysis to address issues of pragmatic and theoretical concern [J].
Ahuvia, A .
SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2001, 54 (02) :139-172
[3]  
Al-Ani B., 2011, Proceedings of the 2011 6th IEEE International Conference on Global Software Engineering (ICGSE 2011), P25, DOI 10.1109/ICGSE.2011.25
[4]   An investigation of factors affecting how engineers and scientists seek information [J].
Anderson, CJ ;
Glassman, M ;
McAfee, RB ;
Pinelli, T .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2001, 18 (02) :131-155
[5]   Influences on knowledge processes in organizational learning: The psychosocial filter [J].
Andrews, KM ;
Delahaye, BL .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2000, 37 (06) :797-810
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2013, DYNAMICS LOGISTICS
[7]   Perceived Information Exchange and Health Control Expectancies as Influenced by a Patient's Medical Interview Situation [J].
Avtgis, Theodore A. ;
Brann, Maria ;
Staggers, Sydney M. .
COMMUNICATION RESEARCH REPORTS, 2006, 23 (04) :231-237
[8]  
BELKIN NJ, 1980, CAN J INFORM SCI, V5, P133
[9]   THE EFFECT OF TIME PRESSURE ON RISKY CHOICE BEHAVIOR [J].
BENZUR, H ;
BREZNITZ, SJ .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 1981, 47 (02) :89-104
[10]  
Berg B., 2001, QUALITATIVE RES METH