MECHANISM OF INSULIN RESISTANCE IN INSULIN-DEPENDENT DIABETES-MELLITUS - A MAJOR ROLE FOR REDUCED SKELETAL-MUSCLE BLOOD-FLOW

被引:196
作者
BARON, AD
LAAKSO, M
BRECHTEL, G
EDELMAN, SV
机构
[1] VET ADM MED CTR, DEPT MED, RES SERV, SAN DIEGO, CA 92161 USA
[2] UNIV CALIF SAN DIEGO, LA JOLLA, CA 92093 USA
[3] RICHARD L ROUDEBUSH VET ADM MED CTR, DEPT MED, RES SERV, INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46202 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1210/jcem-73-3-637
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
To define the kinetic mechanisms of insulin resistance (IR) in insulin-dependent diabetes (IDDM), we studied seven control (C) and five IDDM (glycohemoglobin, 14 +/- 2%) men matched for age (36 +/- 2 vs. 37 +/- 3 yr), lean body mass (59 +/- 2 vs. 58 +/- 3 kg), and leg volume (mean +/- SEM, 10.4 +/- 0.3 vs. 9.8 +/- 0.5 L). Maximal capacity (V(max)) and affinity (K(m)) for glucose uptake in whole body (WBGU) and leg skeletal muscle (LGU) were measured during a 120 mU/m2. min insulin infusion, and blood glucose was clamped at about 4, 7, 12, and 21 mmol/L. LGU = femoral arterio-venous glucose difference (FAVGD) X leg blood flow (LBF). Compared to C, IDDMs had about 35% lower rates of WBGU at all glucose levels (P < 0.01). The FAVGD (millimoles per L) in C vs. IDDM was 1.23 +/- 0.05 vs. 1.06 +/- 0.09, 2.44 +/- 0.11 vs. 2.24 +/- 0.16, 2.91 +/- 0.18 vs. 2.91 +/- 0.30, and 3.27 +/- 0.12 vs. 3.35 +/- 0.4 (P = NS at each glucose). LBF (decaliters per min) was reduced in IDDM vs. C [2.8 +/- 0.5 vs. 4.3 +/- 0.4 (P < 0.05), 3.1 +/- 0.4 vs. 5.1 +/- 0.7 (P < 0.05), 2.7 +/- 0.2 vs. 6.3 +/- 0.8 (P < 0.01), and 3.1 +/- 0.7 vs. 6.5 +/- 0.8 (P < 0.01) at each glucose level]. Kinetic analysis revealed that 1) the V(max) for WBGU and LGU were reduced in IDDM vs. C (P < 0.05), and 2) the V(max) for skeletal muscle glucose extraction (FAVGD) was identical in C and IDDM (3.6 mmol/L). The K(m) values for WBGU, LGU, and glucose extraction were not different in C and IDDM (approximately 6 mmol/L). Thus, in IDDM 1) decreased glucose uptake is due to reduced skeletal muscle glucose uptake; 2) muscle glucose extraction is normal, but blood flow is reduced; and thus, 3) in IDDM, IR is due to reduced glucose and insulin delivery (blood flow) to skeletal muscle. This represents a novel mechanism for in vivo IR.
引用
收藏
页码:637 / 643
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
[21]   DECREASED EFFECT OF INSULIN TO STIMULATE SKELETAL-MUSCLE BLOOD-FLOW IN OBESE MAN - A NOVEL MECHANISM FOR INSULIN RESISTANCE [J].
LAAKSO, M ;
EDELMAN, SV ;
BRECHTEL, G ;
BARON, AD .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 1990, 85 (06) :1844-1852
[22]   ENDOTHELIUM-DEPENDENT RELAXATION IN AORTA OF BB RAT [J].
MERAJI, S ;
JAYAKODY, L ;
SENARATNE, MPJ ;
THOMSON, ABR ;
KAPPAGODA, T .
DIABETES, 1987, 36 (08) :978-981
[23]   INSULIN RESISTANCE AND INSULIN-DEPENDENT DIABETES-MELLITUS [J].
PEDERSEN, O ;
BECKNIELSEN, H .
DIABETES CARE, 1987, 10 (04) :516-523
[24]   INSULIN RECEPTOR-BINDING TO FAT AND BLOOD-CELLS AND INSULIN ACTION IN FAT-CELLS FROM INSULIN-DEPENDENT DIABETICS [J].
PEDERSEN, O ;
HJOLLUND, E .
DIABETES, 1982, 31 (08) :706-715
[25]   FOREARM METABOLISM IN OBESITY AND ITS RESPONSE TO INTRAARTERIAL INSULIN - CHARACTERIZATION OF INSULIN RESISTANCE AND EVIDENCE FOR ADAPTIVE HYPERINSULINISM [J].
RABINOWITZ, D ;
ZIERLER, KL .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 1962, 41 (12) :2173-&
[26]   LACK OF INVIVO INSULIN RESISTANCE IN CONTROLLED INSULIN-DEPENDENT, TYPE-I, DIABETIC-PATIENTS [J].
REVERS, RR ;
KOLTERMAN, OG ;
SCARLETT, JA ;
GRAY, RS ;
OLEFSKY, JM .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 1984, 58 (02) :353-358
[27]   ATHEROSCLEROSIS IN DIABETES - THE ROLE OF HYPERINSULINEMIA [J].
STOLAR, MW .
METABOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 1988, 37 (02) :1-9
[28]  
STOUT R, 1985, METABOLISM S1, V34, P17
[29]   LOCALIZATION OF RATE-LIMITING DEFECT FOR GLUCOSE DISPOSAL IN SKELETAL-MUSCLE OF INSULIN-RESISTANT TYPE-I DIABETIC-PATIENTS [J].
YKIJARVINEN, H ;
SAHLIN, K ;
REN, JM ;
KOIVISTO, VA .
DIABETES, 1990, 39 (02) :157-167
[30]   NORMALIZATION OF INSULIN SENSITIVITY IN TYPE-I DIABETIC SUBJECTS BY PHYSICAL-TRAINING DURING INSULIN PUMP THERAPY [J].
YKIJARVINEN, H ;
DEFRONZO, RA ;
KOIVISTO, VA .
DIABETES CARE, 1984, 7 (06) :520-527