The DMO is dead. Long live the DMO (or, why DMO managers don't care about post-structuralism)

被引:11
作者
Hall, C. Michael [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Veer, Ekant [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Canterbury, Dept Management Mkt & Entrepreneurship, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand
[2] Univ Oulu, Dept Geog, Oulu, Finland
[3] Linneaus Univ, Sch Business & Econ, Kalmar, Sweden
关键词
D O I
10.1080/02508281.2016.1195960
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
[No abstract available]
引用
收藏
页码:354 / 357
页数:4
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Aaker J, 2010, DRAGONFLY EFFECT QUI
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, PUBLIC ORG REV
[3]  
[Anonymous], AM REV PUBLIC ADM
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2004, POLITICS TIME
[5]   The Life and Death of Public Organizations: A Question of Institutional Design? [J].
Boin, Arjen ;
Kuipers, Sanneke ;
Steenbergen, Marco .
GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF POLICY ADMINISTRATION AND INSTITUTIONS, 2010, 23 (03) :385-410
[6]   Political learning from rare events: Poisson inference, fiscal constraints, and the lifetime of bureaus [J].
Carpenter, DP ;
Lewis, DE .
POLITICAL ANALYSIS, 2004, 12 (03) :201-232
[7]  
Gronroos C., 1994, ASIA AUSTR MARKETING, P4, DOI [10.1016/S1320-1646(94)70275-6., DOI 10.1016/S1320-1646(94)70275-6]
[8]  
Hall C. M., 2004, Small firms in tourism: international perspectives, P83, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-08-044132-0.50009-5
[9]  
Hall C.M., 2010, TOURISM POLITICAL CH, P7
[10]  
Hall C.M., 2016, POSTDISASTER MANAGEM, P269