Smart grid co-simulation with MOSAIK and HLA: a comparison study

被引：11

作者：

Steinbrink, C. ^{[1
]}

van der Meer, A. A. ^{[2
]}

Cvetkovic, M. ^{[2
]}

Babazadeh, D. ^{[1
]}

Rohjans, S. ^{[3
]}

Palensky, P. ^{[2
]}

Lehnhoff, S. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] OFFIS Inst Informat Technol, Oldenburg, Germany

[2] Delft Univ Technol, Delft, Netherlands

[3] Hamburg Univ Appl Sci, Hamburg, Germany

来源：

COMPUTER SCIENCE-RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT | 2018年 / 33卷 / 1-2期

基金：

欧盟地平线“2020”;

关键词：

Co-simulation; mosaik; HLA; Cyber-physical energy systems;

D O I：

10.1007/s00450-017-0379-y

中图分类号：

TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];

学科分类号：

0812 ;

摘要：

Evaluating new technological developments for energy systems is becoming more and more complex. The overall application environment is a continuously growing and interconnected cyber-physical system so that analytical assessment is practically impossible to realize. Consequently, new solutions must be evaluated in simulation studies. Due to the interdisciplinarity of the simulation scenarios, various heterogeneous tools must be connected. This approach is known as co-simulation. During the last years, different approaches have been developed or adapted for applications in energy systems. In this paper, two co-simulation approaches are compared that follow generic, versatile concepts. The tool mosaik, which has been explicitly developed for the purpose of co-simulation in complex energy systems, is compared to the High Level Architecture (HLA), which possesses a domain-independent scope but is often employed in the energy domain. The comparison is twofold, considering the tools' conceptual architectures as well as results from the simulation of representative test cases. It suggests that mosaik may be the better choice for entry-level, prototypical co-simulation while HLA is more suited for complex and extensive studies.

引用

页码：135 / 143

页数：9

共 23 条

[1] Anaya L, 2011, IEEE PES INNOV SMART
[2] Blochwitz T., 2009, 8 INT MOD C 2011, P173
[3] Brito AV, 2013, 3 BRAZ S COMP SYST E
[4] The Department of Defense high level architecture
Dahmann, JS
Fujimoto, RM
Weatherly, RM
[J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1997 WINTER SIMULATION CONFERENCE, 1997, : 142 - 149
[5] Dahmann JS, 1998, WINTER SIMULATION C, V1, P797, DOI [10.1109/WSC.1998.745066, DOI 10.1109/WSC.1998.745066]
[6] Georg H, 2013, INT CONF SMART GRID, P576, DOI 10.1109/SmartGridComm.2013.6688020
[7] Godfrey T, 2010, 1 IEEE INT C SMART G
[8] *IEEE, 2000, 151622000 IEEE
[9] Mets K., 2011, 2011 IEEE 16 INT WOR, P61, DOI 10.1109/CAMAD.2011.5941119
[10] Neema H, 2016, WKSP MODEL SIM CYBER

← 1 2 3 →