Two consecutive limb lengthenings with the same PRECICE nail: a technical note

被引:14
作者
Couto, Andre [1 ]
Freitas, Joana [1 ]
Alegrete, Nuno [1 ]
Coutinho, Jorge [1 ]
Costa, Gilberto [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Hosp Sao Joao, Orthopaed & Traumatol, Alameda Prof Hernani Monteiro, P-4200319 Porto, Portugal
来源
STRATEGIES IN TRAUMA AND LIMB RECONSTRUCTION | 2018年 / 13卷 / 03期
关键词
Limb; Lengthening; Magnetic; Nail; Deformity;
D O I
10.1007/s11751-018-0317-y
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose The most significant advance in our time about limb lengthening is the magnetic lengthening nail, as the first reports appeared to show good results with accurate lengthening rates and good regenerate bone formation. The described complication rate is generally low. They avoid external fixation elements, and are activated transcutaneously, so the patient's pain and discomfort are reduced and the rehabilitation is faster and more effective. The aim of authors is to describe a special technical issue of the PRECICE system: the nail can be extended inside the patient limb (after the osteotomy), but it also can be retracted inside the limb after achieving the bone union. Methods The authors present a case in which the limb lengthening has been performed in consecutive lengthening periods using the same nail. The nail was extended and retracted by altering the settings on the external remote control as well as accurately setting the rate of distraction. Results After two consecutive femoral lengthening with the same PRECICE nail, the patient no longer has a significant lower limb length discrepancy and patient satisfaction was high. During this clinical case, we were not confronted with any type of complications. Conclusion This technique utilizes the principles and advantages of lengthening over an magnetic lengthening nail, avoids the necessity of nail removal and minimizes the complication rates and the overall time for complete recovery.
引用
收藏
页码:199 / 204
页数:6
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   A Brief History of Limb Lengthening [J].
Birch, John G. .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS, 2017, 37 (06) :S1-S8
[2]  
Calder P, 2013, ORTHOPAEDIC P S23 ORTHOPAEDIC P S23, P11
[3]   The role of the intramedullary implant in limb lengthening [J].
Calder, Peter R. ;
Laubscher, Maritz ;
Goodier, W. David .
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2017, 48 :S52-S58
[4]   Precision of the PRECICE® Internal Bone Lengthening Nail [J].
Kirane, Yatin M. ;
Fragomen, Austin T. ;
Rozbruch, S. Robert .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2014, 472 (12) :3869-3878
[5]   Outcomes following femoral lengthening AN INITIAL COMPARISON OF THE PRECICE INTRAMEDULLARY LENGTHENING NAIL AND THE LRS EXTERNAL FIXATOR MONORAIL SYSTEM [J].
Laubscher, M. ;
Mitchell, C. ;
Timms, A. ;
Goodier, D. ;
Calder, P. .
BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2016, 98B (10) :1382-1388
[6]   Limb Lengthening by Implantable Limb Lengthening Devices [J].
Paley, Dror ;
Harris, Matthew ;
Debiparshad, Kevin ;
Prince, Daniel .
TECHNIQUES IN ORTHOPAEDICS, 2014, 29 (02) :72-85
[7]   PRECICE intramedullary limb lengthening system [J].
Paley, Dror .
EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2015, 12 (03) :231-249
[8]   Femoral lengthening in children and adolescents [J].
Pejin, Z. .
ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2017, 103 (01) :S143-S149
[9]   How precise is the PRECICE compared to the ISKD in intramedullary limb lengthening? [J].
Schiedel, Frank M. ;
Vogt, Bjoern ;
Tretow, Henning L. ;
Schuhknecht, Britta ;
Gosheger, Georg ;
Horter, Melanie J. ;
Roedl, Robert .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA, 2014, 85 (03) :293-298
[10]   Comparison of Intramedullary Nail Versus Conventional Ilizarov Method for Lower Limb Lengthening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Xu, Wei-guo .
ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2017, 9 (02) :159-166