Patient Characteristics, Procedural Characteristics, and Outcomes in Patients Having Lead Extraction in a

被引:0
作者
O'Connor, Matthew [1 ,2 ]
Schmidt, Philip [1 ]
Knoll, Katharina [1 ,3 ]
Schaarschmidt, Claudia [1 ]
Bock, Matthias [1 ,3 ]
Bahlke, Fabian [1 ]
Georgi, Marie [1 ]
Froehlich, Rebecca [1 ]
Sonne, Carolin [1 ]
Kottmaier, Marc [1 ]
Reents, Tilko [1 ]
Bourier, Felix [1 ]
Hessling, Gabriele [1 ]
Deisenhofer, Isabel [1 ]
Kolb, Christof [1 ]
Lennerz, Carsten [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Klin Tech Univ Munchen, Klin Herz & Kreislauferkrankungen, Deutsch Herzzentrum Munchen, Munich, Germany
[2] Royal Brompton Hosp, Dept Cardiol, London, England
[3] German Ctr Cardiovasc Res DZHK, Partner Site Munich Heart Alliance, Munich, Germany
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The rate of transvenous lead extraction (TLE) is increasing, with an increasing rate of complex devices being implanted. TLE is now a routine part of cardiac device management and up-to-date data on the safety and efficacy of TLE with modern tools and techniques is essential to management decisions regarding noninfectious indications for lead extraction. We present a contemporary, prospective review of TLE at our high-volume cardiac center. All patients who underwent TLE from June 2016 to June 2019 were enrolled in our local database, and baseline clinical data, procedural information, and outcome data were collected. In total, 561 leads were explanted (n = 153) or extracted (n = 408) from 341 patients over the study period. Patients were predominantly male (71%), with a mean age of 65 </n> 17 years. The most common indication for lead removal was lead failure (45.2%, n = 154), followed by infection of the pocket or device (29.3%, n = 100). In total, complete success was achieved in 96.4% (n = 541) leads, clinical success in a further 2.1% (n = 12), and failure only in 1.4% (n = 8). There was an overall complication rate of 0.9% (3/341) for major complications and 1.5% (5/341) for minor complications. There were no deaths. In conclusion, our data suggest that there are ongoing improvements in the safety profile and success rates of lead extraction undertaken by experienced operators. The major complication rate now is <1%. (c) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. (Am J Cardiol 2022;176:51-57)
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 57
页数:7
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]   2018 EHRA expert consensus statement on lead extraction: recommendations on definitions, endpoints, research trial design, and data collection requirements for clinical scientific studies and registries: endorsed by APHRS/HRS/LAHRS [J].
Bongiorni, Maria G. ;
Burri, Haran ;
Deharo, Jean C. ;
Starck, Christoph ;
Kennergren, Charles ;
Saghy, Laszlo ;
Rao, Archana ;
Tascini, Carlo ;
Lever, Nigel ;
Kutarski, Andrzej ;
Lozano, Ignacio Fernandez ;
Strathmore, Neil ;
Costa, Roberto ;
Epstein, Laurence ;
Love, Charles ;
Blomstrom-Lundqvist, Carina ;
Fauchier, Laurent ;
Defaye, Pascal ;
Arnar, David O. ;
Klug, Didier ;
Boveda, Serge ;
Nielsen, Jens Cosedis ;
Boriani, Giuseppe ;
Zhang, Shu ;
Martin, Andrew Paul ;
Prutkin, Jordan M. ;
de Zuloaga, Claudio .
EUROPACE, 2018, 20 (07) :1217-+
[2]   The European Lead Extraction ConTRolled (ELECTRa) study: a European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) Registry of Transvenous Lead Extraction Outcomes [J].
Bongiorni, Maria Grazia ;
Kennergren, Charles ;
Butter, Christian ;
Deharo, Jean Claude ;
Kutarski, Andrzej ;
Rinaldi, Christopher A. ;
Romano, Simone L. ;
Maggioni, Aldo P. ;
Andarala, Maryna ;
Auricchio, Angelo ;
Kuck, Karl-Heinz ;
Blomstrom-Lundqvist, Carina .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2017, 38 (40) :2995-3005
[3]   Clinical predictors of adverse patient outcomes in an experience of more than 5000 chronic endovascular pacemaker and defibrillator lead extractions [J].
Brunner, Michael P. ;
Cronin, Edmond M. ;
Duarte, Valeria E. ;
Yu, Changhong ;
Tarakji, Khaldoun G. ;
Martin, David O. ;
Callahan, Thomas ;
Cantillon, Daniel J. ;
Niebauer, Mark J. ;
Saliba, Walid I. ;
Kanj, Mohamed ;
Wazni, Oussama ;
Baranowski, Bryan ;
Wilkoff, Bruce L. .
HEART RHYTHM, 2014, 11 (05) :799-805
[4]   Reported mortality with rotating sheaths vs. laser sheaths for transvenous lead extraction [J].
Diaz, Celso L. ;
Guo, Xiaofan ;
Whitman, Isaac R. ;
Marcus, Gregory M. ;
Pellegrini, Cara N. ;
Beygui, Ramin E. ;
Lee, Sun Yong ;
Lee, Byron K. .
EUROPACE, 2019, 21 (11) :1703-1709
[5]   From lead management to implanted patient management: systematic review and meta-analysis of the last 15 years of experience in lead extraction [J].
Diemberger, Igor ;
Mazzotti, Andrea ;
Biffi, Mauro ;
Massaro, Giulia ;
Martignani, Cristian ;
Ziacchi, Matteo ;
Reggiani, Maria Letizia Bacchi ;
Battistini, Paola ;
Boriani, Giuseppe .
EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2013, 10 (04) :551-573
[6]   Non-laser percutaneous extraction of pacemaker and defibrillation leads: a decade of progress [J].
Domenichini, Giulia ;
Gonna, Hanney ;
Sharma, Rajan ;
Conti, Sergio ;
Fiorista, Lorenzo ;
Jones, Sue ;
Arthur, Maria ;
Adhya, Shaumik ;
Jahangiri, Marjan ;
Rowland, Edward ;
Gallagher, Mark M. .
EUROPACE, 2017, 19 (09) :1521-1526
[7]   The 11th World Survey of Cardiac Pacing and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators: Calendar Year 2009-A World Society of Arrhythmia's Project [J].
Mond, Harry G. ;
Proclemer, Alessandro .
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2011, 34 (08) :1013-1027
[8]   Lead Extraction in the Contemporary Setting: The LExICon Study An Observational Retrospective Study of Consecutive Laser Lead Extractions [J].
Wazni, Oussama ;
Epstein, Laurence M. ;
Carrillo, Roger G. ;
Love, Charles ;
Adler, Stuart W. ;
Riggio, David W. ;
Karim, Shahzad S. ;
Bashir, Jamil ;
Greenspon, Arnold J. ;
DiMarco, John P. ;
Cooper, Joshua M. ;
Onufer, John R. ;
Ellenbogen, Kenneth A. ;
Kutalek, Stephen P. ;
Dentry-Mabry, Sherri ;
Ervin, Carolyn M. ;
Wilkoff, Bruce L. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 55 (06) :579-586