Easing the transition: the final year of medical education at Maastricht University

被引:5
作者
van den Akker, Marjan [1 ,2 ]
Dornan, Tim [3 ,4 ]
Scherpbier, Albert J. J. A. [4 ]
Egbrink, Mirjam G. A. Oude [5 ]
Snoeckx, Luc H. E. H. [5 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, CAPHRI Sch Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Dept Gen Practice, Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Gen Practice, Leuven, Belgium
[3] Univ Manchester, Hope Hosp, Salford, Lancs, England
[4] Maastricht Univ, Fac Hlth Med & Life Sci, Inst Med Educ, Maastricht, Netherlands
[5] Maastricht Univ, CARIM Sch Cardiovasc Dis, Dept Physiol, Maastricht, Netherlands
来源
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAET IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN | 2012年 / 106卷 / 02期
关键词
medical education; electives;
D O I
10.1016/j.zefq.2012.02.013
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
This manuscript describes the final year of medical education at Maastricht University as it has been operating since 2006. At the time external drivers for the development of a new structure of the final year were: the desire to prepare medical students for lifelong learning, the CanMEDs that were increasingly acknowledged to state the final attainment level of medical education and an increasing recognition of the importance of learning by participating actively and by taking more responsibility. Internal drivers were students' evaluations and our wish to improve instructional design and quality control. The main aim of this new final year is to better prepare students for the transition from the medical master programme to one of the postgraduate training programmes to become a medical specialist. The final year of the medical master programme consists of two 18-weeks participation electives, one in health care and one in research. Students have a higher level of autonomy and responsibility during this final year compared to the preceding medical clerkships to enhance the transition. Portfolios are the key element in examination of SCIP and HELP. Student evaluations of the final year show high scores on coaching and instructiveness. Despite some differences between departments overall scores are very high. Suggestions to improve include the availability of work places and time for education and coaching.
引用
收藏
页码:92 / 97
页数:6
相关论文
共 6 条
[1]   The CanMEDS initiative: implementing an outcomes-based framework of physician competencies [J].
Frank, Jason R. ;
Danoff, Deborah .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 2007, 29 (07) :642-647
[2]  
Miflin BM, 2000, MED EDUC, V34, P299
[3]   Trialling a new way to learn clinical skills: systematic clinical appraisal and learning [J].
Sanson-Fisher, RW ;
Rolfe, IE ;
Jones, P ;
Ringland, C ;
Agrez, M .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2002, 36 (11) :1028-1034
[4]   The Processes and Dimensions of Informed Self-Assessment: A Conceptual Model [J].
Sargeant, Joan ;
Armson, Heather ;
Chesluk, Ben ;
Dornan, Timothy ;
Eva, Kevin ;
Holmboe, Eric ;
Lockyer, Jocelyn ;
Loney, Elaine ;
Mann, Karen ;
van der Vleuten, Cees .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2010, 85 (07) :1212-1220
[5]   The competent novice - Lifelong learning at work [J].
Teunissen, P. W. ;
Dornan, Tim .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 336 (7645) :667-669
[6]   Opportunity or threat: the ambiguity of the consequences of transitions in medical education [J].
Teunissen, Pim W. ;
Westerman, Michiel .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2011, 45 (01) :51-59