ABDUCTION: SOME CONCEPTUAL ISSUES

被引：6

作者：

Urbanski, Mariusz ^{[1
]}

Klawiter, Andrzej ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Adam Mickiewicz Univ, Inst Psychol, Dept Log & Cognit Sci, Poznan, Poland

来源：

LOGIC AND LOGICAL PHILOSOPHY | 2018年 / 27卷 / 04期

关键词：

reasoning; abduction; deduction; cognitive turn in logic;

D O I：

10.12775/LLP.2018.016

中图分类号：

B81 [逻辑学（论理学）];

学科分类号：

010104 ; 010105 ;

摘要：

We claim that abduction should primarily be studied from the perspective of its use. The big question "What is abduction?" is most often interpreted substantively and this distracts attention from the instrumental aspect of this form of reasoning. We propose to address the problem by asking "How abduction is used?". As a result of our approach we see the fact that abduction needs to be construed as concerned with both generation and evaluation of hypotheses, and, furthermore, that abduction is a compound form of reasoning.

引用

页码：583 / 597

页数：15

共 51 条

[1] Ajdukiewicz K, 1974, PRAGMATIC LOGIC
[2] Aliseda A, 1999, SEEKING EXPLANATION
[3] Aliseda A, 2006, SYNTH LIBR, V330, pXI
[4] Belnap N. D., 1969, PHILOS LOGIC, P122
[5] Burnyeat M., 1982, SCI SPECULATION STUD, P193
[6] Abductive Question-Answer System (AQAS) for Classical Propositional Logic
Chlebowski, Szymon
Gajda, Andrzej
[J]. FLEXIBLE QUERY ANSWERING SYSTEMS, FQAS 2017, 2017, 10333 : 3 - 14
[7] THE RELIABILITY OF A HYPOTHESIS GENERATION AND TESTING TASK
DONNELLY, MB
SISSON, JC
WOOLLISCROFT, JO
[J]. MEDICAL EDUCATION, 1990, 24 (06) : 507 - 511
[8] Douven I., 2017, STANFORD ENCY PHILOS, V2017th
[9] Questions and challenges for the new psychology of reasoning
Evans, Jonathan St. B. T.
[J]. THINKING & REASONING, 2012, 18 (01) : 5 - 31
[10] Gabbay D., 2005, HDB PHILOS LOGIC, V13, P15

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 →