IS ADAM SMITH A CONSERVATIVE? THE INVISIBLE HAND, INSTITUTIONAL DESIGN AND SOCIAL HIERARCHY

被引:0
作者
Grdesic, Marko [1 ]
机构
[1] Sveuciliste Zagrebu, Fak Politickih Znanosti, Zagreb, Croatia
来源
POLITICKA MISAO-CROATIAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW | 2016年 / 53卷 / 03期
关键词
Adam Smith; Political Economy; Conservatism; Liberalism; Enlightenment;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
This article asks the following question: Is Adam Smith a conservative? Smith is usually seen as a key author of the liberal tradition, but some of his claims have a strong conservative overtone. Although he frequently defends the individual and his capacity to be the agent of his own history, Smith simultaneously limits this space, arguing that the very same individuals are incapable of understanding their own action, and arguing in favor of socially controlling and disciplining them. Three themes are discussed: (1) Smith's metaphor of the invisible hand, (2) the question of institutional design, and (3) the question of social hierarchy. This article points towards certain tensions in the work of Adam Smith, the Scottish enlightenment, and the liberal tradition which was built, to a large extent, on these foundations.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 107
页数:23
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Baletic Z., 2004, GLOBALIZACIJA DEMOKR, P151
[2]  
CROPSEY J, 1957, POLITY EC INTERPRETA
[4]  
Evensky J, 2005, HIST PERSP MOD ECON, P1, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511610646
[5]  
Foucault M., 1994, NADZOR KAZNA RADANJE
[6]  
Hirschman Albert O, 1981, PASSIONS INTERESTS P
[7]   Is Adam Smith liberal? [J].
Khalil, EL .
JOURNAL OF INSTITUTIONAL AND THEORETICAL ECONOMICS-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR DIE GESAMTE STAATSWISSENSCHAFT, 2002, 158 (04) :664-694
[8]  
Macpherson Crawford Brough, 1981, POLITICKA TEORIJA PO
[9]  
Meek Ronald, 1967, EC IDEOLOGY OTHER ES
[10]   THE UNANTICIPATED CONSEQUENCES OF PURPOSIVE SOCIAL ACTION [J].
Merton, Robert K. .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1936, 1 (06) :894-904