Physiotherapy clinical education: Pros and cons and the way forward

被引：0
|
作者：
Pang, Marco Y. C. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Honk Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Rehabil Sci, Honk Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
来源：
HONG KONG PHYSIOTHERAPY JOURNAL | 2011年 / 29卷 / 02期
关键词：
D O I：
10.1016/j.hkpj.2011.08.001
中图分类号：
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号：
100215 ;
摘要：
引用
收藏
页码：41 / 41
页数：1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Single Family Rooms for the NICU: Pros, Cons and the Way Forward
    Dunn, Michael S.
    MacMillan-York, Elizabeth
    Robson, Kate
    NEWBORN AND INFANT NURSING REVIEWS, 2016, 16 (04) : 218 - 221
  • [2] FORWARD GUIDANCE, PROS, CONS AND CREDIBILITY
    Ryczkowski, Maciej
    PRAGUE ECONOMIC PAPERS, 2017, 26 (05): : 523 - 541
  • [3] Education reform: Pros and cons
    Farr, JV
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT IN ENGINEERING, 1997, 13 (06) : 34 - 36
  • [4] The pros and cons of clinical trials
    Eden, OB
    MEDICAL AND PEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY, 1998, 31 (06): : 521 - 521
  • [5] PROS AND CONS OF AUGMENTED REALITY IN EDUCATION
    Galati, Francesco
    Bigliardi, Barbara
    Deiana, Angelo
    Filippelli, Serena
    Petroni, Alberto
    EDULEARN19: 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND NEW LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, 2019, : 9165 - 9168
  • [6] Pros and cons of innovations in medical education
    Lifshitz-Guinzberg, Alberto
    Abreu-Hernandez, Luis F.
    Sepulveda-Vildosola, Ana C.
    Esther Urrutia-Aguilar, Ma
    Cordova-Villalobos, Jose A.
    Lopez-Barcena, Joaquin
    Sanchez-Mendiola, Melchor
    GACETA MEDICA DE MEXICO, 2021, 157 (03): : 338 - 348
  • [7] THE PROS AND CONS OF PUBLIC-EDUCATION
    不详
    CIVIL ENGINEERING, 1989, 59 (02): : 75 - 75
  • [8] Pros and Cons: Web Based Education
    Liu Jingyu
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2014 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION, MANAGEMENT AND COMPUTING TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 100 : 459 - 461
  • [9] Rules in the clinical setting: Pros and cons
    McKie, J
    HEALTH CARE ANALYSIS, 1998, 6 (04) : 305 - 307
  • [10] Pros and cons of pragmatic clinical trials
    Lurie, Jon D.
    Morgan, Tamara S.
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH, 2013, 2 (01) : 53 - 58
12345