Validity and Problem-Based Learning Research: A Review of Instruments Used to Assess Intended Learning Outcomes
被引:44
作者:
Selland, Brian R.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Utah State Univ, Instruct Technol & Learning Sci, Logan, UT 84322 USA
Purdue Univ, Educ Technol, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USAUtah State Univ, Instruct Technol & Learning Sci, Logan, UT 84322 USA
Selland, Brian R.
[1
,3
]
French, Brian F.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Washington State Univ, Dept Educ Leadership & Counseling Psychol area Re, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
Purdue Univ, Educ Technol, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USAUtah State Univ, Instruct Technol & Learning Sci, Logan, UT 84322 USA
French, Brian F.
[2
,3
]
Ertmer, Peggy A.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Purdue Univ, Educ Technol, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USAUtah State Univ, Instruct Technol & Learning Sci, Logan, UT 84322 USA
Ertmer, Peggy A.
[3
]
机构:
[1] Utah State Univ, Instruct Technol & Learning Sci, Logan, UT 84322 USA
[2] Washington State Univ, Dept Educ Leadership & Counseling Psychol area Re, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
[3] Purdue Univ, Educ Technol, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
Problem-based learning (PBL) spread from the medical school to other university and K-12 contexts due, in part, to the stated promise that PBL produces the target outcomes of deep content learning, increased problem-solving ability, and increased self-directed learning (Hmelo-Silver, 2004). However, research results have been unclear. This paper examines how the three target outcomes of PBL were measured in 33 empirical studies. Results indicate that few studies included 1) theoretical frameworks for the assessed variables and constructs, 2) rationales for how chosen assessments matched the constructs measured, or 3) other information required for readers to assess the validity of authors' interpretations. Implications for future research are discussed.