Validity and Problem-Based Learning Research: A Review of Instruments Used to Assess Intended Learning Outcomes

被引:44
作者
Selland, Brian R. [1 ,3 ]
French, Brian F. [2 ,3 ]
Ertmer, Peggy A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Utah State Univ, Instruct Technol & Learning Sci, Logan, UT 84322 USA
[2] Washington State Univ, Dept Educ Leadership & Counseling Psychol area Re, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
[3] Purdue Univ, Educ Technol, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
来源
INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING | 2009年 / 3卷 / 01期
关键词
validity; problem-solving ability; deep content learning; self-directed learning; measures; problem-based learning;
D O I
10.7771/1541-5015.1059
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Problem-based learning (PBL) spread from the medical school to other university and K-12 contexts due, in part, to the stated promise that PBL produces the target outcomes of deep content learning, increased problem-solving ability, and increased self-directed learning (Hmelo-Silver, 2004). However, research results have been unclear. This paper examines how the three target outcomes of PBL were measured in 33 empirical studies. Results indicate that few studies included 1) theoretical frameworks for the assessed variables and constructs, 2) rationales for how chosen assessments matched the constructs measured, or 3) other information required for readers to assess the validity of authors' interpretations. Implications for future research are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 89
页数:31
相关论文
共 89 条