Efficiency evaluation of commercial liquid biofertilizers for growth of Cicer aeritinum (chickpea) in pot and field study

被引:23
作者
Ansari, Mohammed Faisal [1 ]
Tipre, Devayani R. [1 ]
Dave, Shailesh R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Gujarat Univ, Sch Sci, Dept Microbiol & Biotechnol, Ahmadabad 380009, Gujarat, India
关键词
Liquid biofertilizer; Azotobacter; Phosphate solubilizers; Green house trial; Field trial;
D O I
10.1016/j.bcab.2014.09.010
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The effectiveness of commercially available biofertilizers is not always the same in pot and field study. In the present work, efficiency of 6 different commercially available liquid biolertilizers containing Azotobacter strains or phosphate solubilizers obtained from three reputed brands was assessed in green house (pot study) and also at field level on growth enhancement of Cicer aeritinurn (chickpea). The results obtained in pot level studies showed marginal beneficial effects ranging between 21% and 50% in total final yield. At field level, PPS (P < 0.01) and consortium of all 6 products (P < 0.01) showed significant improvements by 144% and 140% respectively than control in total final yield. In pot studies, Azotobacter biolertilizers gave good results when seed germination, average shoot length and leaf chlorophyll contents were analyzed in controlled environments whereas in field studies, in general, phosphate solubilizing biofertilizers gave better overall yield. Though overall yield increase was observed upon application of liquid biofertilizers, the leaf chlorophyll and seed protein content were not different as compared to control. Moreover, where the producer is more inclined to obtain higher yield per hectare, for the consumer the nutrition value is more significant. This stands true for vegetarians, where a large number of people around the world depend on legumes such as chickpea as protein source in their diet as other protein sources are unaffordable for them. Hence to be more effective nutritionally; improvement is required in the already existing liquid biofertilizers available commercially. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 24
页数:8
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
Abou-Aly H E, 2009, ANN AGR SCI MOSHTOHO, V47, P1
[2]   Alternatives to peat as a carrier for rhizobia inoculants: Solid and liquid formulations [J].
Albareda, Marta ;
Rodriguez-Navarro, Dulce N. ;
Camacho, Maria ;
Temprano, Francisco J. .
SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 2008, 40 (11) :2771-2779
[3]  
Arun Karnwal, 2012, Annals Food Science and Technology, V13, P43
[4]  
Atia Iqbal, 2013, American Journal of Plant Sciences, V4, P1693
[5]  
Bala Brij, 2005, Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, V39, P146
[6]   Inoculants of plant growth-promoting bacteria for use in agriculture [J].
Bashan, Y .
BIOTECHNOLOGY ADVANCES, 1998, 16 (04) :729-770
[7]   Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): emergence in agriculture [J].
Bhattacharyya, P. N. ;
Jha, D. K. .
WORLD JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY & BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2012, 28 (04) :1327-1350
[8]  
Brar S.K., 2012, J BIOFERTIL BIOPESTI, V3, DOI DOI 10.4172/2155-6202.1000E109
[9]  
Chandra K., 2005, LIQUID BIOFERTILIZER
[10]  
Dere Sukran, 1998, Turkish Journal of Botany, V22, P13