SPINAL SUFENTANIL IN RATS .1. EPIDURAL VERSUS INTRATHECAL SUFENTANIL AND MORPHINE

被引:15
作者
BOERSMA, FP
MEERT, TF
VERCAUTEREN, M
机构
[1] JANSSEN RES FDN,DEPT NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOL,B-2340 BEERSE,BELGIUM
[2] REFAJAHOSP,STADSKANAAL,NETHERLANDS
[3] UNIV HOSP ANTWERP,DEPT ANAESTHESIA,EDEGEM,BELGIUM
关键词
ANALGESICS; SUFENTANIL; ANESTHETIC TECHNIQUES; EPIDURAL; INTRATHECAL; MORPHINE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1399-6576.1992.tb03449.x
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Male Wistar rats were injected epidurally or intrathecally with increasing doses of sufentanil or morphine in order to determine differences in potency, onset and duration of analgesia and supra-spinal side-effects. For sufentanil, only small differences in the lowest ED50-values for analgesia and supra-spinal side-effects were observed between the two spinal routes. Given intrathecally, sufentanil had a somewhat faster onset but a shorter duration of action than did epidural sufentanil. However, intrathecal morphine when compared to epidural morphine had a faster onset with a greater potency and a longer duration of action. The stronger opioid activity of intrathecal morphine was also reflected in a reduced safety ratio for the blockade of the cornea reflex. These differences between the two opioids, with regard to their optimal route of spinal administration, are discussed in terms of lipophilicity and optimal clinical use.
引用
收藏
页码:187 / 192
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of ropivacaine combined with sufentanil for epidural anesthesia and spinal-epidural anesthesia in labor analgesia
    Wang, Yanshuang
    Xu, Mingjun
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [32] Transplacental transfer and neonatal influences of sonophoretically administered sufentanil versus epidural sufentanil in labor peridural analgesia: A randomized prospective double-blind contemplate
    Saleh, Riham Hussein
    Ebade, Abdelhay Abdelgayed
    Ibrahim, Mohamed
    Tomerek, Rania Hossny
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2014, 30 (04) : 387 - 392
  • [33] INTRATHECAL MORPHINE 0.2 MG VERSUS EPIDURAL BUPIVACAINE 0.125-PERCENT OR THEIR COMBINATION - EFFECTS ON PARTURIENTS
    ABOULEISH, E
    RAWAL, N
    SHAW, J
    LORENZ, T
    RASHAD, MN
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1991, 74 (04) : 711 - 716
  • [34] Intrathecal sufentanil and epidural bupivacaine for labor analgesia: Dose-response of individual agents and in combination
    Camann, W
    Abouleish, A
    Eisenach, J
    Hood, D
    Datta, S
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 1998, 23 (05): : 457 - 462
  • [35] Epidural ropivacaine 1% with and without sufentanil addition for Caesarean section
    Bachmann-Mennenga, B
    Veit, G
    Biscoping, J
    Steinicke, B
    Heesen, M
    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2005, 49 (04) : 525 - 531
  • [36] DIFFERENTIAL RIGHT SHIFTS IN THE DOSE-RESPONSE CURVE FOR INTRATHECAL MORPHINE AND SUFENTANIL AS A FUNCTION OF STIMULUS-INTENSITY
    DIRIG, DM
    YAKSH, TL
    PAIN, 1995, 62 (03) : 321 - 328
  • [37] SUFENTANIL CITRATE AND MORPHINE BUPIVACAINE AS ALTERNATIVE AGENTS IN CHRONIC EPIDURAL INFUSIONS FOR INTRACTABLE NONCANCER PAIN
    HASSENBUSCH, SJ
    STANTONHICKS, MD
    SOUKUP, J
    COVINGTON, EC
    BOLAND, MB
    NEUROSURGERY, 1991, 29 (01) : 76 - 82
  • [38] Epidural versus intrathecal morphine for postoperative analgesia after Caesarean section
    Dualé, C
    Frey, C
    Bolandard, F
    Barrière, A
    Schoeffler, P
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2003, 91 (05) : 690 - 694
  • [39] Epidural analgesia with 0.15% ropivacaine plus sufentanil 0.5 μg ml-1 versus 0.10% bupivacaine plus sufentanil 0.5 μg ml-1:: a double-blind comparison during labour
    Clément, HJ
    Caruso, L
    Lopez, F
    Broisin, F
    Blanc-Jouvan, M
    Derré-Brunet, E
    Thomasson, A
    Leboucher, G
    Viale, JP
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2002, 88 (06) : 809 - 813
  • [40] Addition of low-dose morphine to intrathecal bupivacaine/sufentanil labour analgesia: A randomised controlled study
    Hein, A.
    Rosblad, P.
    Norman, M.
    Ryniak, S.
    Tingaker, B.
    Jakobsson, J.
    Dahlgren, G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 2010, 19 (04) : 384 - 389