Osteocutaneous flaps for head and neck reconstruction: A focused evaluation of donor site morbidity and patient reported outcome measures in different reconstruction options

被引:53
|
作者
Kearns, Marie [1 ,2 ]
Ermogenous, Panagiotis [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Myers, Simon [1 ]
Ghanem, Ali Mahmoud [1 ]
机构
[1] Barts & London Queen Marys Sch Med & Dent, Acad Plast Surg, London, England
[2] Glasgow Royal Infirm, Canniesburn Plast Surg Unit, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[3] Nicosia Gen Hosp, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Nicosia, Cyprus
[4] Nicosia Gen Hosp, Burns Unit, Nicosia, Cyprus
来源
ARCHIVES OF PLASTIC SURGERY-APS | 2018年 / 45卷 / 06期
关键词
Free tissue flaps; Mandibular reconstruction; Quality of life; Postoperative complications;
D O I
10.5999/aps.2017.01592
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
With significant improvements in success rates for free flap reconstruction of the head and neck, attention has turned to donor site morbidity associated with osteocutaneous free flaps. In this review, we address the morbidity associated with harvest of the four most commonly used osteocutaneous flaps; the free fibula flap, the scapula flap, the iliac crest flap and the radial forearm flap. A comprehensive literature search was performed to identify articles relevant to donor site morbidity for these flaps. We assessed morbidity in terms of incidence of delayed healing, chronic pain, aesthetic outcomes, site specific complications and patient satisfaction/quality of life. Weighted means were calculated when sufficient studies were available for review. The radial forearm and free fibula flaps are associated with high rates of delayed healing of approximately 20% compared to the scapular (< 10%) and iliac flaps (5%). The radial forearm flap has higher rates of chronic pain (16.7%) and dissatisfaction with scar appearance (33%). For the majority of these patients harvest of one of these four osteocutaneous does not limit daily function at long-term follow-up. The scapular osteocutaneous flap is associated with the lowest relative morbidity and should be strongly considered when the recipient defect allows. The radial forearm is associated with higher morbidity in terms of scarring, fractures, chronic pain and wrist function and should not be considered as first choice when other flap options are available.
引用
收藏
页码:495 / 503
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Functional outcome in patients with advanced head and neck cancer: surgery and reconstruction with free flaps versus primary radiochemotherapy
    Tschiesner, Uta
    Schuster, Lena
    Strieth, Sebastian
    Harreus, Ulrich
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2012, 269 (02) : 629 - 638
  • [32] Patient-Reported Aesthetic and Psychosocial Outcomes After Microvascular Reconstruction for Head and Neck Cancer
    Zebolsky, Aaron L.
    Patel, Neil
    Heaton, Chase M.
    Park, Andrea M.
    Seth, Rahul
    Knott, P. Daniel
    JAMA OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2021, 147 (12) : 1035 - 1044
  • [33] Does Ischemia Time Affect the Outcome of Free Fibula Flaps for Head and Neck Reconstruction? A Review of 116 Cases
    Chang, Shu-Ying
    Huang, Jung-Ju
    Tsao, Chung-Kan
    Nguyen, Anh
    Mittakanti, Krithi
    Lin, Chia-Yu
    Cheng, Ming-Huei
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2010, 126 (06) : 1988 - 1995
  • [34] Accuracy and Precision of the Computed Tomographic Angiography Perforator Localization Technique for Virtual Surgical Planning of Composite Osteocutaneous Fibular Free Flaps in Head and Neck Reconstruction
    Ettinger, Kyle S.
    Morris, Jonathan M.
    Alexander, Amy E.
    Nathan, John M.
    Arce, Kevin
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2022, 80 (08) : 1434 - 1444
  • [35] Patient-reported outcome measures and physical function following head and neck lymphedema - a systematic review
    Gaitatzis, Katrina
    Thompson, Belinda
    Blake, Fiona Tisdall
    Koelmeyer, Louise
    JOURNAL OF CANCER SURVIVORSHIP, 2024,
  • [36] The Importance of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in Oncological Vulvoperineal Defect Reconstruction: A Systematic Review
    Speck, Nicole E.
    Stoffel, Julia
    Wendelspiess, Severin
    Appenzeller-Herzog, Christian
    Schaefer, Kristin M.
    Kouba, Loraine P.
    Rueter, Florian
    Montavon, Celine
    Heinzelmann-Schwarz, Viola
    Haug, Martin D.
    Schaefer, Dirk J.
    Ismail, Tarek
    Kappos, Elisabeth A.
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2024, 31 (10) : 6300 - 6313
  • [37] Donor-Site Morbidity After Pedicled TRAM Breast Reconstruction A Comparison of Two Different Types of Mesh
    Svaerdborg, Mille
    Damsgaard, Tine Engberg
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2013, 71 (05) : 476 - 480
  • [38] Patients' and Healthcare Professionals' Perspectives on Better Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Head and Neck Cancer
    de Jel, Dominique V. C.
    Young-Afat, Danny A.
    Ooms-Renckens, Marleen M.
    Smeele, Ludi E.
    Rakhorst, Hinne A.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2023, 26 (08) : 1210 - 1216
  • [39] Patient-reported outcome during radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: the use of different PRO questionnaires
    Steen-Olsen, Emma Balch
    Stormoen, Dag Rune
    Kristensen, Claus Andrup
    Vogelius, Ivan Richter
    Hollander-Mieritz, Cecilie
    Pappot, Helle
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2022, 279 (08) : 4199 - 4206
  • [40] Patient-reported outcome during radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: the use of different PRO questionnaires
    Emma Balch Steen-Olsen
    Dag Rune Stormoen
    Claus Andrup Kristensen
    Ivan Richter Vogelius
    Cecilie Holländer-Mieritz
    Helle Pappot
    European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2022, 279 : 4199 - 4206