Selection criteria for a radiography programme in South Africa: Predictors for academic success in the first year of study

被引:2
作者
Kridiotis, Carol Anne [1 ]
Bezuidenhout, Johan [1 ]
Raubenheimer, Jacques [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Free State, Fac Hlth Sci, Div Hlth Sci Educ, Bloemfontein, South Africa
[2] Univ Free State, Fac Hlth Sci, Sch Med, Dept Biostat, Bloemfontein, South Africa
来源
HEALTH SA GESONDHEID | 2016年 / 21卷
关键词
Selection criteria; Radiography; Predictors; Academic success;
D O I
10.1016/j.hsag.2016.01.005
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Selection criteria used to admit students to a radiography programme at the Central University of Technology (CUT) included academic criteria, as well as the General Scholastic Aptitude Test (GSAT) and Self-directed Search (SDS) Questionnaire. Aims and objectives: The aim of the study was to identify which selection criteria were predictors of academic success in the first year of study. As a four year Bachelor's degree in Radiography (480 credits) was to replace the three year National Diploma (NDip) in Radiography (360 credits), selection criteria would come under review. Design and method: Data from 130 students were gathered in a retrospective quantitative study. Data were edited, categorised and summarised. A statistical analysis was undertaken to identify which selection criteria predicted academic success in the first year of study. Results: Statistics showed that the matriculation Admission Points Score (National Senior Certificate/NCS APS) and corematriculation subject results in Mathematics, Physical Sciences and English were adequate predictors for first-year academic success, and the subjects Life Sciences for the NSC and Biology for the Senior Certificate (SC), showed strong predictive values for first-year academic success. According to the statistical analysis, the GSAT and SDS Questionnaire did not contribute any significant information which could predict academic success. Conclusion: Matriculation marks and NSC APS were adequate predictors for academic success, with a focus on Life Sciences or Biology marks as the strongest predictor. The usefulness of the GSAT and SDS Questionnaire could be questioned, and a recommendation was made to replace these tests with alternative student selection methods. (c) 2016 The Authors. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Johannesburg University. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.
引用
收藏
页码:206 / 213
页数:8
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
Badat S., 2011, INSIGHT, V03
[2]  
Botma Y., 2010, RES HLTH SCI, V1st
[3]  
Burdess N., 2010, STARTING STAT SHORT
[4]  
Central Queensland University (CQU), 2015, BACH MED IM
[5]  
Cliff A., 2007, ENSOVOORT SPECIAL ED, V11, P33
[6]   The design and use of 'alternate' assessments of academic literacy as selection mechanisms in higher education [J].
Cliff, Alan ;
Hanslo, Monique .
SOUTHERN AFRICAN LINGUISTICS AND APPLIED LANGUAGE STUDIES, 2009, 27 (03) :265-276
[7]  
CUL (City University London), 2013, RAD DIAGN IM
[8]  
CUT (Central University of Technology), 2013, PROSP 2013
[9]  
Derby University, 2015, BACH SCI DIAGN RAD
[10]   The structural validity of Holland's R-I-A-S-E-C model of vocational personality types for young black South African men and women [J].
du Toit, R ;
de Bruin, GP .
JOURNAL OF CAREER ASSESSMENT, 2002, 10 (01) :62-77