Complementarity in Subject Metadata in Large-Scale Digital Libraries: A Comparative Analysis

被引:11
作者
Zavalina, Oksana [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ North Texas, Dept Lib & Informat Sci, Denton, TX 76203 USA
关键词
digital libraries; metadata quality; collection-level metadata; subject metadata;
D O I
10.1080/01639374.2013.848316
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Provision of high-quality subject metadata is crucial for organizing adequate subject access to rich content aggregated by digital libraries. A number of large-scale digital libraries worldwide are now generating subject metadata to describe not only individual objects but entire digital collections as an integral whole. However, little research to date has been conducted to empirically evaluate the quality of this collection-level subject metadata. The study presented in this article compares free-text and controlled-vocabulary collection-level subject metadata in three large-scale cultural heritage digital libraries in the United States and the European Union. As revealed by this study, the emerging best practices for creating rich collection-level subject metadata includes describing a collection's subject matter with mutually complementary data values in controlled-vocabulary and free-text subject metadata elements. Three kinds of complementarity were observed in this study: one-way complementarity, two-way complementarity, and multiple complementarity.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 89
页数:13
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Arms Caroline R., 1996, D LIB MAGAZINE
[2]  
Baker T., 2011, P INT C DUBL COR MET, P147
[3]  
Bruce Thomas R., 2004, METADATA PRACTICE, P238
[4]   Relevance criteria identified by health information users during Web searches [J].
Crystal, Abe ;
Greenberg, Jane .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 57 (10) :1368-1382
[5]  
DRORI O, 2003, P NEW DEV DIG LIB, P13
[6]  
DUVAL E., 2002, D LIB MAGAZINE, V8, P4
[7]  
GREENBERG J, 2003, ENCY LIB INFORM SCI, P1876
[8]  
Hillmann DI, 2008, CAT CLASSIF Q, V46, P65, DOI 10.1080/01639370802183008
[9]  
KRIKELAS J, 1972, ADV LIBRARIANSHIP, V3, P195
[10]  
Macgregor G., 2003, Library Review, V52, P247, DOI 10.1108/00242530310482015