Lexical access of mass and count nouns How word recognition reaction times correlate with lexical and morpho-syntactic processing

被引:9
作者
Mondini, Sara [1 ,2 ]
Kehayia, Eva [3 ]
Gillon, Brendan [4 ]
Arcara, Giorgio [1 ]
Jarema, Gonia [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Padua, Dept Gen Psychol, Padua, Italy
[2] Casa Cura Figlie San Camillo, Cremona, Italy
[3] McGill Univ, Ctr Rech Interdisciplinaire Readaptat Montreal Me, Sch Phys & Occupat Therapy, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] McGill Univ, Dept Linguist, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[5] Univ Montreal, Ctr Rech, Inst Univ Geriatrie Montreal, Dept Linguist & Traduct, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
mass nouns; count nouns; morpho-syntactic features; lexicalized features; lexical decision; sentence priming;
D O I
10.1075/ml.4.3.03mon
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
Two psycholinguistic experiments were carried out in Italian to test the role played by the feature that distinguishes mass nouns from count nouns, as well as by the feature that distinguishes singular nouns from plural nouns. The first experiment, a simple lexical decision task, revealed a sensitivity of the lexical access system to the processing of the features Mass and Plural as shown by longer reaction times. In particular, nouns in the plural yielded longer reaction times than in the singular except when the plural form was irregular. Furthermore, the feature Mass also affected processing, yielding longer reaction times. In the second experiment, a sentence priming task, both the Plural and the Mass effects did not surface when a grammatical sentence fragment was the prime. These data show a direct correlation between the linguistic 'complexity' of plural/mass nouns and processing time. They also suggest that this complexity does not affect normal fluent spoken language where words are embedded in a semantic and syntactic context.
引用
收藏
页码:354 / 379
页数:26
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Baayen R. H., 1996, YB MORPHOLOGY 1996, P55
[2]   Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual-route modes [J].
Baayen, RH ;
Dijkstra, T ;
Schreuder, R .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1997, 37 (01) :94-117
[3]  
Bertinetto P. M., 2005, CORPUS LESSI COFREQU
[4]   The mass/count distinction: Evidence from on-line psycholinguistic performance [J].
Gillon, B ;
Kehayia, E ;
Taler, V .
BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 1999, 68 (1-2) :205-211
[5]   TOWARDS A COMMON SEMANTICS FOR ENGLISH COUNT AND MASS NOUNS [J].
GILLON, BS .
LINGUISTICS AND PHILOSOPHY, 1992, 15 (06) :597-639
[6]   THE SUM AND SUBSTANCE OF IT - THE APPRECIATION OF MASS AND COUNT QUANTIFIERS IN PARKINSONS-DISEASE [J].
GROSSMAN, M ;
CARVELL, S ;
PELTZER, L .
BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 1993, 44 (04) :351-384
[7]  
Jespersen Otto., 1927, MODERN ENGLISH GRAMM
[8]   Priming English past tense verbs: Rules or statistics? [J].
Kielar, Arleta ;
Joanisse, Marc F. ;
Hare, Mary L. .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2008, 58 (02) :327-346
[9]   Morphological processing in Italian agrammatic speakers: Eight experiments in lexical morphology [J].
Luzzatti, C ;
DeBleser, R .
BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 1996, 54 (01) :26-74
[10]   Lexical representation and processing of morphologically complex words: Evidence from the reading performance of an Italian agrammatic patient [J].
Luzzatti, C ;
Mondini, S ;
Semenza, C .
BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 2001, 79 (03) :345-359