An Argument for Strong Learning in Higher Education

被引:32
作者
Bramming, Pia [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Res Ctr Working Environm, Lerso Parkalle 105, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
Learning; strong learning; transformative learning; evaluation;
D O I
10.1080/13538320701272722
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This article debates whether the concept of satisfaction as a measurement of quality in higher education supports the goal of enhancing transformative learning. As higher education is about transforming people, not just their knowledge, it is argued that learning challenges the identities of students, and even questions their personal integrity. Transformative learning is a painful process as well as a state of being that students have to accept and see as not only necessary but desired. Considerations of quality in higher education should therefore proceed from the goal of enhancing transformative learning based on the concept of 'strong learning'. A 'transformative learning identity' demands philosophically grounded pedagogics, not only about learning as a process but about the forces that shape and make learning possible in the first place. Strong learning-being such a learning philosophy-approaches learning as a social and processural phenomenon, where learning is made possible through a specific assemblage of social and processural conditions that force learning to be transformative through a continuous production of crisis.
引用
收藏
页码:45 / 56
页数:12
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Andersen NA., 2003, DISCURSIVE ANAL STRA
[2]  
Baumann Z., 2001, COMMUNITY SEEKING SA
[3]  
Beck U., 2002, INDIVIDUALIZATION
[4]  
Bourdieu P., 1997, LOGIC PRACTICE
[5]  
Bourdieu P., 1992, INVITATION REFEXIVE
[6]  
BRAMMING P., 2001, KOMPETENCE I PRAKSIS
[7]   Relationality [J].
Cooper, R .
ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 2005, 26 (11) :1689-1710
[8]  
Cooper R., 1998, ORG WORLDS EXPLORATI
[9]  
COOPER R., 2007, ORG STUDIES
[10]   Entrepreneurial learning and critical reflection - Discontinuous events as triggers for 'higher-level' learning [J].
Cope, J .
MANAGEMENT LEARNING, 2003, 34 (04) :429-450