ULTIMATUM BARGAINING BEHAVIOR - A SURVEY AND COMPARISON OF EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS

被引:343
作者
GUTH, W
TIETZ, R
机构
[1] Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt/Main
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0167-4870(90)90021-Z
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In an ultimatum bargaining game players 1 and 2 can distribute a positive amount of money in the following way: first, player 1 determines his demand which player 2 can then either accept or induce conflict, i.e. player 2 faces the ultimatum either to accept player 1's proposal or to have no agreement at all. Experimentally observed ultimatum bargaining decisions with amounts ranging from 0.50 to 100 German marks are statistically analysed. The demands of player 1 are compared with the acceptance behavior of player 2 with the help of consistency tests in which a subject has to decide in the position of both players. Finally, we consider ultimatum bargaining games with more than just one round where, except for the final round, nonacceptance does not cause conflict but another round of ultimatum bargaining for a smaller cake. © 1990.
引用
收藏
页码:417 / 449
页数:33
相关论文
共 35 条
[11]  
GUTH W, 1988, GAME EQUILIBRIUM MOD, V2
[12]  
GUTH W, 1988, 21 U BIEL ZIF WORK P
[13]  
GUTH W, 1990, DISTRIBUTIVE JUSTICE
[14]  
GUTH W, 1988, A26 FRANKF ARB EXP W
[15]  
GUTH W, 1988, LECTURE NOTES EC MAT, V314, P111
[16]  
Guth Werner, 1988, APPLIED BEHAVIORAL E, V2, P703
[17]   AN EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION OF WEAKEST LINK BEST SHOT MODELS OF PUBLIC-GOODS [J].
HARRISON, GW ;
HIRSHLEIFER, J .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1989, 97 (01) :201-225
[18]  
HARTUNG J, 1986, MULTIVARIATE STATIST
[19]   ENTITLEMENTS, RIGHTS, AND FAIRNESS - AN EXPERIMENTAL EXAMINATION OF SUBJECTS CONCEPTS OF DISTRIBUTIVE JUSTICE [J].
HOFFMAN, E ;
SPITZER, ML .
JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES, 1985, 14 (02) :259-297
[20]   THE COASE THEOREM - SOME EXPERIMENTAL TESTS [J].
HOFFMAN, E ;
SPITZER, ML .
JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 1982, 25 (01) :73-98