Opportunities for biodiversity conservation as cities adapt to climate change

被引:29
作者
Butt, Nathalie [1 ]
Shanahan, Danielle F. [1 ,2 ]
Shumway, Nicole [1 ,3 ]
Bekessy, Sarah A. [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Fuller, Richard A. [1 ]
Watson, James E. M. [3 ,6 ]
Maggini, Ramona [1 ,7 ]
Hole, David G. [8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Biol Sci, ARC Ctr Excellence Environm Decis, St Lucia, Qld, Australia
[2] Zealandia Sanctuary, Wellington, New Zealand
[3] Univ Queensland, Sch Earth & Environm Sci, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[4] RMIT Univ, Ctr Urban Res, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[5] RMIT Univ, Natl Environm Res Programme Clean Air & Urban Lan, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[6] Wildlife Conservat Soc, Global Conservat Program, Bronx, NY USA
[7] QUT, Sch Earth Environm & Biol Sci, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[8] Conservat Int, Betty & Gordon Moore Ctr Sci & Oceans, Arlington, VA USA
[9] Univ Durham, Sch Biol & Biomed Sci, Durham, England
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
biodiversity; climate change adaptation; conservation planning; urban environment; urban population;
D O I
10.1002/geo2.52
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Cities are investing billions of dollars in climate change adaptation to combat the effects of sea-level rise, temperature extremes, increasingly intense storm events, flooding and water scarcity. Natural ecosystems have enormous potential to contribute to city resilience, and so, actions that rely on this approach could sustain considerable co-benefits for biodiversity. In this paper we identify the prevalence of key themes of human adaptation response that could have biodiversity conservation outcomes in cities. We then quantify the area of impact for actions that identify specific targets for greening or green infrastructure that could involve natural ecosystems, providing an indicator of potential co-benefits to biodiversity. We then extrapolate to explore the total area of land that could benefit from catchment management approaches, the area of waterways that could benefit from nature-based improvement of these spaces, and finally the number of threatened species that could benefit across these cities. From 80 city climate adaptation plans analysed, we found that urban greening plays a key role in most adaptation strategies, and represents an enormous opportunity for biodiversity conservation, given the diversity of animal and plant species in urban environments. We show that the ranges of at least 270 threatened species overlap with the area covered by just 58 city adaptation plans, including watershed catchments totalling over 28 million km(2). However, an analysis of 80 city adaptation plans (of a total 151 found globally) shows that this opportunity is being missed. Just 18% of the plans assessed contained specific intentions to promote biodiversity. We highlight this missed opportunity, as climate adaptation actions undertaken by cities represent an enormous incipient opportunity for nature conservation. Finally, we encourage planners and city governments to incorporate biological conservation into climate adaption plans, for the mutual benefit of urban societies and their biodiversity.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1999, J NAT RESOUR
[2]   A global analysis of the impacts of urbanization on bird and plant diversity reveals key anthropogenic drivers [J].
Aronson, Myla F. J. ;
La Sorte, Frank A. ;
Nilon, Charles H. ;
Katti, Madhusudan ;
Goddard, Mark A. ;
Lepczyk, Christopher A. ;
Warren, Paige S. ;
Williams, Nicholas S. G. ;
Cilliers, Sarel ;
Clarkson, Bruce ;
Dobbs, Cynnamon ;
Dolan, Rebecca ;
Hedblom, Marcus ;
Klotz, Stefan ;
Kooijmans, Jip Louwe ;
Kuehn, Ingolf ;
MacGregor-Fors, Ian ;
McDonnell, Mark ;
Mortberg, Ulla ;
Pysek, Petr ;
Siebert, Stefan ;
Sushinsky, Jessica ;
Werner, Peter ;
Winter, Marten .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2014, 281 (1780)
[3]   Conservation conflicts across Africa [J].
Balmford, A ;
Moore, JL ;
Brooks, T ;
Burgess, N ;
Hansen, LA ;
Williams, P ;
Rahbek, C .
SCIENCE, 2001, 291 (5513) :2616-2619
[4]   Colonisation of native tree and shrub plantings by woodland birds in an agricultural landscape [J].
Barrett, G. W. ;
Freudenberger, D. ;
Drew, A. ;
Stol, J. ;
Nicholls, A. O. ;
Cawsey, E. M. .
WILDLIFE RESEARCH, 2008, 35 (01) :19-32
[5]   Transparent planning for biodiversity and development in the urban fringe [J].
Bekessy, Sarah Adine ;
White, Matt ;
Gordon, Ascelin ;
Moilanen, Atte ;
Mccarthy, Michael Andrew ;
Wintle, Brendan Anthony .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2012, 108 (2-4) :140-149
[6]   Looking Back and Thinking Ahead: A Decade of Cities and Climate Change Research [J].
Betsill, Michele ;
Bulkeley, Harriet .
LOCAL ENVIRONMENT, 2007, 12 (05) :447-456
[7]  
Biagini B., 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V25, P97, DOI [DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.01.003, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.01.003]
[8]  
Birdlife International & NatureServe, 2014, BIRD SPEC DISTR MAPS
[9]   Ecosystem services in urban areas [J].
Bolund, P ;
Hunhammar, S .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1999, 29 (02) :293-301
[10]   Cascades of green: A review of ecosystem-based adaptation in urban areas [J].
Brink, Ebba ;
Aalders, Theodor ;
Adam, Dora ;
Feller, Robert ;
Henselek, Yuki ;
Hoffmann, Alexander ;
Ibe, Karin ;
Matthey-Doret, Aude ;
Meyer, Moritz ;
Negrut, N. Lucian ;
Rau, Anna-Lena ;
Riewerts, Bente ;
von Schuckmann, Lukas ;
Tornros, Sara ;
von Wehrden, Henrik ;
Abson, David J. ;
Wamsler, Christine .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2016, 36 :111-123