EPIDEMIOLOGY OF ANGUINA-AGROSTIS ON HIGHLAND COLONIAL BENTGRASS

被引:0
|
作者
PINKERTON, JN [1 ]
ALDERMAN, SC [1 ]
机构
[1] USDA ARS,NATL FORAGE SEED PROD & RES CTR,CORVALLIS,OR 97330
关键词
ANGUINA-AGROSTIS; AGROSTIS-TENUIS; BENTGRASS; CROP LOSS; EPIDEMIOLOGY; NEMATODE; SEED-GALL NEMATODE; POPULATION DYNAMICS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q95 [动物学];
学科分类号
071002 ;
摘要
The epidemiology of Anguina agrostis was investigated in field plots of Colonial bentgrass (cv. Highland), Agrostis tenuis, near Corvallis, Oregon. Each October from 1990-92, nylon mesh pouches, each containing 10 galls, were buried in the field or placed on the soil surface in microplots. Pouches were collected monthly or bimonthly between December and June and nematodes per gall counted. Nematode egression from galls began in late March and was completed by mid-May, corresponding to the period of floral initiation in bentgrass. In 1991 and 1992, 0.09-m2 plots were inoculated with 0, 1, 5, 15, 50, 120, or 200 galls/plot. The disease severity (number of galls) and disease incidence (% seed heads with galls) increased linearly at inoculum densities below 50 galls/plot. At higher inoculum densities, disease increase approached an asymptote. In 1991, plots were established to determine the characteristics of disease spread. Disease foci were established by placing 0, 5, 50, or 500 galls along 30-cm sections of row in the fall. In July 1992, seed heads were harvested at 30 and 60 cm from each focus within and across plant rows. Most infestations were found within 30 cm of foci at all inoculum levels. At high inoculum densities, the distribution of galls was aggregated with the majority of galls located on less than 10% of the seed heads. These disease spread and incidence data suggest populations of A. agrostis increase slowly in bentgrass in Oregon.
引用
收藏
页码:315 / 323
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION ON REPRODUCTIVE AND MORPHOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR OF SEVERAL SELECTIONS OF COLONIAL BENTGRASS AGROSTIS TENUIS SIBTH
    DUDECK, AE
    DUICH, JM
    CROP SCIENCE, 1967, 7 (06) : 605 - &
  • [22] Creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera) tolerance to sulfosulfuron
    McCullough, Patrick E.
    Hart, Stephen E.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 22 (03) : 481 - 485
  • [23] Tolerance of Bentgrass (Agrostis) Species and Cultivars to Methiozolin
    Hoisington, Nicholas R.
    Flessner, Michael L.
    Schiavon, Marco
    McElroy, J. Scott
    Baird, James H.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 28 (03) : 501 - 509
  • [24] Genetic diversity in colonial bentgrass (Agrostis capillaris L.) revealed by EcoRI-MseI and PstIMseI AFLP markers
    Zhao, Han
    Bughrara, Suleiman S.
    Oliveira, Jose Alberto
    GENOME, 2006, 49 (04) : 328 - 335
  • [25] Seedling creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera) tolerance to dithiopyr
    Bevard, DS
    Watschke, TL
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 13 (02) : 216 - 220
  • [26] Velvet bentgrass (Agrostis canina L.) is the likely ancestral diploid maternal parent of allotetraploid creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera L.)
    David Rotter
    Karen V. Ambrose
    Faith C. Belanger
    Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 2010, 57 : 1065 - 1077
  • [27] Rapid detection of Anguina agrostis by loop-mediated isothermal amplification
    Yu, Lu-zhen
    Song, Shao-yi
    Yu, Cui
    Jiao, Bin-bin
    Tian, Yi-min
    Li, You-jun
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PATHOLOGY, 2020, 156 (03) : 819 - 825
  • [28] HEAT TOLERANCE OF ANHYDROBIOTIC SEED GALL NEMATODES, ANGUINA AGROSTIS.
    Eisenback, J. D.
    Roane, C. W.
    Way, J. R.
    Selz, Neil
    JOURNAL OF NEMATOLOGY, 2009, 41 (04) : 326 - 326
  • [29] Velvet bentgrass (Agrostis canina L.) is the likely ancestral diploid maternal parent of allotetraploid creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera L.)
    Rotter, David
    Ambrose, Karen V.
    Belanger, Faith C.
    GENETIC RESOURCES AND CROP EVOLUTION, 2010, 57 (07) : 1065 - 1077
  • [30] Rapid detection of Anguina agrostis by loop-mediated isothermal amplification
    Lu-zhen Yu
    Shao-yi Song
    Cui Yu
    Bin-bin Jiao
    Yi-min Tian
    You-jun Li
    European Journal of Plant Pathology, 2020, 156 : 819 - 825