Web Analytics Reveal User Behavior: TTU Libraries' Experience with Google Analytics

被引:9
|
作者
Barba, Ian [1 ]
Cassidy, Ryan [1 ]
De Leon, Esther [1 ]
Williams, B. Justin [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas Tech Univ Lib, 18th & Boston, Lubbock, TX 79409 USA
关键词
Google Analytics; Web analytics; academic library Web sites; user behavior;
D O I
10.1080/19322909.2013.828991
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Proper planning and assessment surveys of projects for academic library Web sites will not always be predictive of real world use, no matter how many responses they might receive. In this case, multiple-phase development, librarian focus groups, and patron surveys performed before implementation of such a project inaccurately overrated utility and positive impact. The Web Site Support Team of Texas Tech University Libraries conducted post-assessment usage of a locally developed reference tool using Google Analytics, which revealed a significant disparity between expectations and results. Web analytics tools, while not able to predict users' needs, are adept at describing users' behavior. This user-provided evidence is invaluable for informing the decisions that academic libraries make about their Web sites. While the initial incarnation of the reference tool failed to provide the intended service, Web analytics allowed the team to refine, modify, and integrate elements of the tool into other areas of the Web site, saving the project from being completely scrapped. Other academic libraries and libraries in large organizations are encouraged to use Web analytics and click analytics tools to assess the outcomes of Web projects. Such data can reveal blind spots in predictive usage, which may originate even in the patron base, and can allow modification of projects based upon real user behavior.
引用
收藏
页码:389 / 400
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Deep Belief Network-Based User and Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) for Web Applications
    Deepa, S.
    Umamageswari, A.
    Neelakandan, S.
    Bhukya, Hanumanthu
    Haritha, I. V. Sai Lakshmi
    Shanbhog, Manjula
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COOPERATIVE INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2024, 33 (02)
  • [22] Monitoring web traffic source effectiveness with Google Analytics An experiment with time series
    Plaza, Beatriz
    ASLIB PROCEEDINGS, 2009, 61 (05): : 474 - 482
  • [23] USING GOOGLE ANALYTICS TO EVALUATE IMPLEMENTATION OF A WEB-BASED INJURY INTERVENTION
    Winston, F. K.
    Yang, C.
    Marsac, M.
    Kohser, K.
    Kassam-Adams, N.
    INJURY PREVENTION, 2010, 16 : A123 - A123
  • [24] Web Services Discovery: a Google experience for users in University Libraries
    Groposo Pavao, Caterina Marta
    Caregnato, Sonia Elisa
    EM QUESTAO, 2015, 21 (03): : 130 - 149
  • [25] Assessing Online Content Quality through User Surveys and Web Analytics
    Muirhead, Jessica
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 CONFERENCE ON HUMAN INFORMATION INTERACTION AND RETRIEVAL (CHIIR'19), 2019, : 433 - 436
  • [26] A comprehensive investigation of clustering algorithms for User and Entity Behavior Analytics
    Artioli, Pierpaolo
    Maci, Antonio
    Magri, Alessio
    FRONTIERS IN BIG DATA, 2024, 7
  • [27] Data Privacy Enhancing in the IoT User/Device Behavior Analytics
    Li, Shancang
    Zhao, Shanshan
    Gope, Prosanta
    Xu, Li Da
    ACM TRANSACTIONS ON SENSOR NETWORKS, 2023, 19 (02)
  • [28] Protecting privacy on the web: A study of HTTPS and Google Analytics implementation in academic library websites
    OBrien, Patrick
    Young, Scott W. H.
    Arlitsch, Kenning
    Benedict, Karl
    ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW, 2018, 42 (06) : 734 - 751
  • [29] Converting Opinion into Knowledge Improving User Experience and Analytics of Online Polls
    Stabauer, Martin
    Mayrhauser, Christian
    Karlinger, Michael
    HCI IN BUSINESS, GOVERNMENT, AND ORGANIZATIONS: ECOMMERCE AND INNOVATION, PT I, 2016, 9751 : 330 - 340
  • [30] Architecture for User Experience Tracking and Analytics in National Digital Library (NDL)
    Anthony, Poonam
    Aggarwal, Kushagra
    Bhowmick, Plaban Kumar
    2016 IEEE 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TECHNOLOGY FOR EDUCATION (T4E 2016), 2016, : 176 - 179