STUDY OF THE QUALITY OF DUPLICATED RADIOGRAPHS

被引：11

作者：

ERALES, FA ^{[1
]}

MANSONHING, LR ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] UNIV ALABAMA,DEPT DENT RADIOL,BIRMINGHAM,AL 35294

来源：

ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS | 1979年 / 47卷 / 01期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1016/0030-4220(79)90110-5

中图分类号：

R78 [口腔科学];

学科分类号：

1003 ;

摘要：

The resolution, contrast, and clinical appearance of radiographs and duplicate radiographs made with two types of duplicating film were compared. Duplicating conditions evaluated were type and shape of light, light-film distance, type of exposure surface, and developer temperature. Major observations were as follows; both Kodak and DuPont films produced clinically acceptable duplicates; Kodak film was faster; DuPont film responded better in incandescent photoflood light than Kodak film; clear glass with appropriate light-film distance was the best exposure surface. © 1979.

引用

页码：98 / 104

页数：7

共 15 条

[1]

Allen M J, 1976, Dent Radiogr Photogr, V49, P14

[2]

CLARK HA, 1957, BRIT DENT J, V102, P229

[3]

DILLON C, 1958, DENT DIGEST, V64, P16

[4]

Esworthy S, 1968, Dent Assist, V37, P26

[5]

Fertman A, 1969, JPO J Pract Orthod, V3, P200

[6]

GIBSON H L, 1965, Dent Radiogr Photogr, V38, P60

[7]

GREER PF, 1972, ORAL SURG, V34, P146

[8]

MANSON-HING L R, 1962, Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, V15, P173, DOI 10.1016/0030-4220(62)90005-1

[9]

MILDER J J, 1959, J Am Dent Assoc, V58, P93

[10]

PAPPAS CG, 1968, J AM DENT ASS, P613

← 1 2 →