Impact of dose calculation algorithm on radiation therapy

被引:41
作者
Chen, Wen-Zhou [1 ]
Xiao, Ying [1 ]
Li, Jun [1 ]
机构
[1] Jefferson Med Coll, Dept Radiat Oncol, 111 South 11th St, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
关键词
Dose calculation; Algorithm; Radiation therapy; Tumor control probability; Normal tissue complication probability;
D O I
10.4329/wjr.v6.i11.874
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The quality of radiation therapy depends on the ability to maximize the tumor control probability while minimizing the normal tissue complication probability. Both of these two quantities are directly related to the accuracy of dose distributions calculated by treatment planning systems. The commonly used dose calculation algorithms in the treatment planning systems are reviewed in this work. The accuracy comparisons among these algorithms are illustrated by summarizing the highly cited research papers on this topic. Further, the correlation between the algorithms and tumor control probability/normal tissue complication probability values are manifested by several recent studies from different groups. All the cases demonstrate that dose calculation algorithms play a vital role in radiation therapy. (c) 2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:874 / 880
页数:7
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   ACQUISITION OF THE EFFECTIVE LATERAL ENERGY FLUENCE DISTRIBUTION FOR PHOTON-BEAM DOSE CALCULATIONS BY CONVOLUTION MODELS [J].
AHNESJO, A ;
TREPP, A .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1991, 36 (07) :973-985
[2]   A PENCIL BEAM MODEL FOR PHOTON DOSE CALCULATION [J].
AHNESJO, A ;
SAXNER, M ;
TREPP, A .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1992, 19 (02) :263-273
[3]   COLLAPSED CONE CONVOLUTION OF RADIANT ENERGY FOR PHOTON DOSE CALCULATION IN HETEROGENEOUS MEDIA [J].
AHNESJO, A .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1989, 16 (04) :577-592
[4]  
American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM), 2004, 85 AAPM
[5]   A PHOTON DOSE DISTRIBUTION MODEL EMPLOYING CONVOLUTION CALCULATIONS [J].
BOYER, A ;
MOK, E .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1985, 12 (02) :169-177
[6]   Clinical implications in the use of the PBC algorithm versus the AAA by comparison of different NTCP models/parameters [J].
Bufacchi, Antonella ;
Nardiello, Barbara ;
Capparella, Roberto ;
Begnozzi, Luisa .
RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2013, 8
[7]   THE CLINICAL IMPACT OF DIFFERENCES IN PHOTON DOSE ALGORITHMS: 3DCRT AND SBRT OF LUNG TUMOURS [J].
Chandrasekaran, M. ;
Panettieri, V. ;
Baker, C. ;
Nahum, A. E. .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2011, 99 :S427-S428
[8]   Correlation of dose computed using different algorithms with local control following stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR)-based treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer [J].
Chetty, Indrin J. ;
Devpura, Suneetha ;
Liu, Dezhi ;
Chen, Daiquan ;
Li, Haisen ;
Wen, Ning ;
Kumar, Sanath ;
Fraser, Correen ;
Siddiqui, M. Salim ;
Ajlouni, Munther ;
Movsas, Benjamin .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2013, 109 (03) :498-504
[9]   Impact of inhomogeneity corrections on dose coverage in the treatment of lung cancer using stereotactic body radiation therapy [J].
Ding, George X. ;
Duggan, Dennis M. ;
Lu, Bo ;
Hallahan, Dennis E. ;
Cmelak, Anthony ;
Malcolm, Arnold ;
Newton, Jared ;
Deeley, Matthew ;
Coffey, Charles W. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 34 (07) :2985-2994
[10]   WHEN AND HOW CAN WE IMPROVE PRECISION IN RADIOTHERAPY [J].
DUTREIX, A .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1984, 2 (04) :275-292