THE IMPORTANCE OF LEAF STRUCTURE IN OVIPOSITION BY LEAF-MINING MICROLEPIDOPTERA

被引:25
|
作者
REAVEY, D
GASTON, KJ
机构
[1] HARVARD UNIV, MUSEUM COMPARAT ZOOL, CAMBRIDGE, MA 02138 USA
[2] NAT HIST MUSEUM, DEPT ENTOMOL, LONDON SW7 5BD, ENGLAND
关键词
D O I
10.2307/3545403
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Broad patterns exist in the site of oviposition for British leaf-mining Lepidoptera. Of 227 species, 21% lay only on the upper surface of leaves, 73% only on the lower surface and 6% on both. We examine possible explanations for this pattern based on the requirements of the egg, larva and ovipositing adult, and on the surface and internal structures of the leaves on which the larvae feed. A significantly greater proportion of tree-feeding than herb-feeding species lays on the lower surface of leaves, suggesting that surface microclimate could be important. Species laying on both surfaces tend to lay on plants which differ less in pubescence between the two surfaces. There are insufficient data on relative thicknesses of the upper and lower leaf epidermides to suggest whether or not penetration by the newly-eclosed larva is important. Several food plant species diverge from the usual dorsiventral organisation of palisade parenchyma and spongy mesophyll within the leaf, affecting the location of larval feeding and, apparently for Populus spp, oviposition also. We give several reasons why we expect species to lay on the lower surface, yet 20% selectively lay on the upper surface. We suggest this is because oviposition is time-limited and laying on the upper surface is quicker and simpler.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 28
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The effects of group size, leaf size, and density on the performance of a leaf-mining moth
    Low, Candace
    Wood, Simon N.
    Nisbet, Roger M.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 2009, 78 (01) : 152 - 160
  • [22] LEAF SIZE SELECTION BY LEAF-MINING INSECTS ON QUERCUS-EMORYI (FAGACEAE)
    BULTMAN, TL
    FAETH, SH
    OIKOS, 1986, 46 (03) : 311 - 316
  • [23] NOTIPHYLA-SIMILIS - A RICE LEAF-MINING MAGGOT
    MANJUNATH, TM
    VIJAYENDRA, M
    FAO PLANT PROTECTION BULLETIN, 1979, 27 (03): : 94 - 95
  • [24] Insights into the evolution of herbivory from a leaf-mining fly
    Aguilar, Jessica M.
    Gloss, Andrew D.
    Suzuki, Hiromu C.
    Verster, Kirsten I.
    Singhal, Malvika
    Hoff, Jordan
    Grebenok, Robert
    Nabity, Paul D.
    Behmer, Spencer T.
    Whiteman, Noah K.
    ECOSPHERE, 2024, 15 (04):
  • [25] Drought stress differentially affects leaf-mining species
    Staley, Joanna T.
    Mortimer, Simon R.
    Masters, Gregory J.
    Morecroft, Michael D.
    Brown, Valerie K.
    Taylor, Michele E.
    ECOLOGICAL ENTOMOLOGY, 2006, 31 (05) : 460 - 469
  • [26] NOTES ON LEAF-MINING CHRYSOMELIDAE (COLEOPTERA) IN NEW ENGLAND
    Eiseman, Charles S.
    COLEOPTERISTS BULLETIN, 2015, 69 (03): : 453 - 458
  • [27] Checklist of the leaf-mining flies (Diptera, Agromyzidae) of Finland
    Kahanpaa, Jere
    ZOOKEYS, 2014, (441) : 291 - 303
  • [28] Semiochemical attractants for the beech leaf-mining weevil, Orchestes fagi
    Silk, P. J.
    Mayo, P. D.
    LeClair, G.
    Brophy, M.
    Pawlowski, S.
    MacKay, C.
    Hillier, N. K.
    Hughes, C.
    Sweeney, J. D.
    ENTOMOLOGIA EXPERIMENTALIS ET APPLICATA, 2017, 164 (02) : 102 - 112
  • [29] Seasonality of a tropical leaf-mining moth: leaf availability versus enemy-free space
    Hopkins, GW
    Memmott, J
    ECOLOGICAL ENTOMOLOGY, 2003, 28 (06) : 687 - 693
  • [30] Is oviposition and larval damage by the leaf-mining fly Calycomyza eupatorivora (Agromyzidae) on its target weed, Chromolaena odorata (Asteraceae), restricted by leaf-quality preferences?
    Nzama, Sindisiwe
    Olckers, Terence
    Zachariades, Costas
    BIOCONTROL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 24 (06) : 680 - 689