COMPARISON OF BIPARIETAL DIAMETER MEASUREMENTS USING A REAL-TIME SCANNER AND A CONVENTIONAL SCANNER EQUIPPED WITH A CODED CEPHALOMETRY SYSTEM

被引：18
作者：
ADAM, AH
ROBINSON, HP
FLEMING, JEE
HALL, AJ
机构：
来源：
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY | 1978年 / 85卷 / 07期
关键词：
D O I：
10.1111/j.1471-0528.1978.tb15619.x
中图分类号：
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号：
100211 ;
摘要：
引用
收藏
页码：487 / 491
页数：5
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
CAMPBELL S, 1970, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of the British Commonwealth, V77, P1057
[2]  
CAMPBELL S, 1968, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of the British Commonwealth, V75, P568
[3]  
Campbell S, 1974, Clin Perinatol, V1, P507
[4]  
CAMPBELL S, 1974, LANCET, V1, P69
[5]  
CAMPBELL S, 1969, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of the British Commonwealth, V76, P603
[6]  
COOPERBERG P L, 1976, Journal of Clinical Ultrasound, V4, P421, DOI 10.1002/jcu.1870040609
[7]  
DAVISON JM, 1973, J OBSTET GYN BR COMM, V80, P769
[8]   COMPARISON BETWEEN LINEAR-ARRAY REAL-TIME ULTRASONIC-SCANNING AND CONVENTIONAL COMPOUND SCANNING IN MEASUREMENT OF FETAL BIPARIETAL DIAMETER [J].
DOCKER, MF ;
SETTATREE, RS .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1977, 84 (12) :924-929
[9]  
LUNT RM, 1974, J OBSTET GYN BR COMM, V81, P682
[10]  
ROBINSON HP, 1977, RECENT ADV OBSTETRIC, P239
1