ANALGESIC EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF TRAMADOL ENANTIOMERS IN COMPARISON WITH THE RACEMATE - A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND-STUDY WITH GYNECOLOGICAL PATIENTS USING INTRAVENOUS PATIENT-CONTROLLED ANALGESIA

被引:46
|
作者
GROND, S [1 ]
MEUSER, T [1 ]
ZECH, D [1 ]
HENNIG, U [1 ]
LEHMANN, KA [1 ]
机构
[1] GRUNENTHAL GMBH,D-52220 STOLBERG,GERMANY
关键词
OPIATE; TRAMADOL; ENANTIOMER; PAIN; POSTOPERATIVE; ANALGESIA; PATIENT-CONTROLLED;
D O I
10.1016/0304-3959(94)00274-I
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
The opioid analgesic tramadol is a racemate and consists of 50% (+)- and 50% (-)-enantiomer. This study investigated analgesic efficacy and safety of both enantiomers after intravenous (i.v.) injection in comparison with the racemate. Ninety-eight patients recovering from major gynaecological surgery under opioid-free halothane anaesthesia were treated in a randomised, double-blind study with (+)-tramadol, (-)-tramadol or the racemate. Following an individualised i.v. loading dose up to a maximum of 200 mg, patient-controlled analgesia with demand doses of 20 mg was made available for 24 h. The primary criterion of efficacy was the decrease of pain intensity on a 5-point verbal rating scale from severe or maximum pain to mild or no pain within the first hour after the loading dose. The secondary criterion was patient satisfaction with pain relief during the 24-h observation period stated in the final interview. Patients who terminated the study prematurely were evaluated as non-responders. Of patients treated with (+)-tramadol, tramadol racemate, and (-)-tramadol, 12%, 15% and 53% of treated patients, respectively, terminated the study prematurely because of inefficacy. Of patients treated with (+)-tramadol, racemate or(-)-tramadol 67%, 48% and 38%, respectively, were considered responders regarding the primary criterion of efficacy (P = 0.061), and 82%, 76% or 41% with respect to the secondary criterion (P = 0.001). Assessment of laboratory screening, adverse events, vital signs and blood gas monitoring showed no serious drug-related events. Nausea and vomiting were the most frequently reported non-serious side effects and were most often seen with(+)-tramadol. Taking into account both efficacy and safety aspects, the racemate seems to be superior to either enantiomer alone.
引用
收藏
页码:313 / 320
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A randomized, double-blind, crossover comparison of the efficacy and safety of oral controlled-release tramadol and placebo in patients with painful osteoarthritis
    Thorne, Carter
    Beaulieu, Andre D.
    Callaghan, Denis J.
    O'Mahony, William F.
    Bartlett, John M.
    Knight, Richard
    Kraag, Gunnar R.
    Akhras, Ronald
    Piraino, Paula S.
    Eisenhoffer, John
    Harsanyi, Zoltan
    Darke, Andrew C.
    PAIN RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT, 2008, 13 (02): : 93 - 102
  • [32] Comparison of efficacy of diclofenac and tramadol in relieving pain in patients of acute pancreatitis: A randomized parallel group double blind active controlled pilot study
    Kumar, Nadipalli S.
    Muktesh, Gaurav
    Samra, Tanvir
    Sarma, Phulen
    Samanta, Jayanta
    Sinha, Saroj K.
    Dhaka, Narendra
    Yadav, Thakur D.
    Gupta, Vikas
    Kochhar, Rakesh
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2020, 24 (03) : 639 - 648
  • [33] A Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Randomized Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy of Oral Ketorolac Versus Intramuscular Tramadol After Third Molar Surgery
    Nasyam, Fazil Arshad
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL INVESTIGATION, 2020, 10 (04) : 586 - 589
  • [34] Safety and efficacy of intravenous hydromorphone patient-controlled analgesia versus intramuscular pethidine in acute pancreatitis: An open-label, randomized controlled trial
    Chen, Zhiyao
    Jiang, Kun
    Liu, Fei
    Zhu, Ping
    Cai, Fei
    He, Yanqiu
    Jin, Tao
    Lin, Ziqi
    Li, Qian
    Hu, Cheng
    Tan, Qingyuan
    Yang, Xiaonan
    Guo, Jia
    Huang, Wei
    Deng, Lihui
    Xia, Qing
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [35] Continuous infusion of butorphanol combined with intravenous morphine patient-controlled analgesia after total abdominal hysterectomy: a randomized, double-blind controlled trial
    Wang, FuZhou
    Shen, XiaoFeng
    Liu, YuSheng
    Xu, ShiQin
    Guo, XiRong
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2009, 26 (01) : 28 - 34
  • [36] Efficacy of preventive analgesia with tramadol or lornoxicam for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
    Kaygusuz, Kenan
    Gokce, Gokhan
    Kol, Iclal Ozdernir
    Ayan, Semih
    Gursoy, Sinan
    CURRENT THERAPEUTIC RESEARCH-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 2007, 68 (04): : 205 - 216
  • [37] Analgesic efficacy of TENS therapy in patients with gonarthrosis A prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study
    Gschiel, B.
    Kager, H.
    Pipam, W.
    Weichart, K.
    Likar, R.
    SCHMERZ, 2010, 24 (05): : 494 - 500
  • [38] Analgesic efficacy and safety of tramadol/acetaminophen combination tablets (Ultracet®) in treatment of chronic low back pain:: A multicenter, outpatient, randomized, double blind, placebo controlled trial
    Peloso, PM
    Fortin, L
    Beaulieu, A
    Kamin, M
    Rosenthal, NR
    JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2004, 31 (12) : 2454 - 2463
  • [39] Reprint of: Efficacy and safety of different doses of dezocine for preemptive analgesia in gynecological laparoscopic surgeries: A prospective, double blind and randomized controlled clinical trial
    Zhou, Meiyan
    Wang, Liwei
    Wu, Congyou
    Yan, Li
    Wang, Rongguo
    Sun, Bin
    Wang, Jianhua
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 49 : 84 - 90
  • [40] INTRAVENOUS SUFENTANIL AND MORPHINE FOR POST-CARDIAC SURGERY PAIN RELIEF USING PATIENT-CONTROLLED ANALGESIA (PCA) DEVICE: A RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-BLIND CLINICAL TRIAL
    Alavi, Seyed Mostafa
    Kish, Rasoul Ferasat
    Farsad, Fariborz
    Imani, Farnad
    Sheikhvatan, Mehrdad
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2010, 26 (01) : 137 - 141