WATER REPELLENCY IN A DRY SCLEROPHYLL EUCALYPT FOREST - MEASUREMENTS AND PROCESSES

被引:145
作者
CROCKFORD, H
TOPALIDIS, S
RICHARDSON, DP
机构
[1] Division of Water Resources, CSIRO, ACT, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, 2601
[2] Now of Department of Administrative Services, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory
关键词
SOIL; WATER REPELLENCY; HYDROPHOBICITY;
D O I
10.1002/hyp.3360050408
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
The magnitude of soil water repellency in a dry sclerophyll eucalypt forest was measured periodically over four years. The varying responses from a range of sites within the forest are discussed and the effect of amount and frequency of rainfall is shown. It was found that some weeks of consistently wet weather were required for water repellency breakdown, and a frequency of rainfall much greater than normal in the study area for it to remain broken down. Even after an extended period of breakdown, it was found that repellency can be reestablished after one week of hot dry weather. Laboratory tests were used to examine the major repellency processes; three were identified and the relative importance of each considered in the context of the field study. The relative influence of each depended on the physical and chemical characteristics of the sites. The repellent soil samples were more repellent to water of throughfall origin, and even more repellent to stemflow than to distilled water. The repellency response also varied with the type of vegetative cover present. The influence of these phenomena on the preservation of water repellency and the relevance of repellency in macropore infiltration processes are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:405 / 420
页数:16
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [11] Hubble G.D., Isbell R.F., Northcote K.H., Features of Australia Soils, Soils: An Australian Viewpoint, pp. 17-47, (1983)
  • [12] Jamison V.C., Structure of Dunkirk silty clay loam in relation to pF moisture measurements, J. Am. Soc. Agron., 19, pp. 307-321, (1942)
  • [13] King P.M., Comparison of methods for measuring severity of water‐repellency of sandy soils and assessment of some factors that affect its measurement, Aust. J. Soil. Res., 19, pp. 275-285, (1981)
  • [14] Letey J., pp. 43-47, (1969)
  • [15] Ma'shun M., Farmer V.C., Origin and assessment of water‐repellency of a sandy South Australian soil, Australian Journal of Soil Research, 23, pp. 623-626, (1985)
  • [16] Ma'shun M., Tate M.E., Jones G.P., Oades J.M., Extraction and characterization of water‐repellent materials from Australian soils, Journal of Soil Science, 39, pp. 99-110, (1988)
  • [17] McGhie D.A., The contribution of the mallet hill surface to runoff and erosion in the Narrogin region of Western Australia, Aust. J. Soil Res., 18, 3, pp. 299-307, (1980)
  • [18] McGhie D.A., (1983)
  • [19] McGhie D.A., Posner A.M., Water repellence of a heavy‐textured Western Australian surface soil, Aust. J. Soil. Res., 18, 3, pp. 309-323, (1980)
  • [20] McGhie D.A., Posner A.M., The effect of plant top material on the water repellence of fired sands and water repellent soils, Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 32, 4, pp. 609-620, (1981)