Ten commandments of Lean Six Sigma: a practitioners' perspective

被引:77
作者
Antony, Jiju [1 ]
Gupta, Sandeep [1 ]
Sunder, Vijaya M. [2 ]
Gijo, E. V. [3 ]
机构
[1] Heriot Watt Univ, Dept Business Management, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Indian Inst Technol Madras, Dept Management Studies, Madras, Tamil Nadu, India
[3] Indian Stat Inst, SQC & OR Unit, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
关键词
Six Sigma; Lean; Continuous improvement; Lean Six Sigma; Process excellence; Ten commandments;
D O I
10.1108/IJPPM-07-2017-0170
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to provide lean and six sigma professionals and researchers of tomorrow with Ten Commandments of Lean Six Sigma (LSS). Design/methodology/approach The Ten Commandments of LSS are based on several years' experience of four authors who act as researchers, LSS Master Black Belts, consultants, practitioners and trainers on various topics of Lean, Six Sigma and general quality management and continuous improvement. Findings The Ten Commandments in our opinion include: alignment of LSS initiative with organisational strategy, LSS project selection and prioritisation, selection of top talent for the project execution, leadership for LSS, effective training and design of appropriate curriculum for different LSS roles, development of reward and recognition system, LSS sustainability, Linking LSS with Organisational Learning and Innovation, Linking LSS with Environmental Management System Standards and finally LSS and Big Data. Research limitations/implications The key features outlined in this paper are based on the practitioners of LSS. The authors of this article are planning to pursue a global study to critically evaluate these commandments by various practitioners of LSS. Originality/value The senior managers and executives of various businesses can use these commandments of LSS as a guide to achieve and sustain competitive advantage.
引用
收藏
页码:1033 / 1044
页数:12
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   Critical failure factors of Lean Six Sigma: a systematic literature review [J].
Albliwi, Saja ;
Antony, Jiju ;
Lim, Sarina ;
van der Wiele, Ton .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITY & RELIABILITY MANAGEMENT, 2014, 31 (09) :1012-1030
[2]   The Porter Hypothesis at 20: Can Environmental Regulation Enhance Innovation and Competitiveness? [J].
Ambec, Stefan ;
Cohen, Mark A. ;
Elgie, Stewart ;
Lanoie, Paul .
REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2013, 7 (01) :2-22
[3]  
American Society for Quality, 2017, 6 SIGM MAST BLACK BE
[4]   Dynamic capabilities through continuous improvement infrastructure [J].
Anand, Gopesh ;
Ward, Peter T. ;
Tatikonda, Mohan V. ;
Schilling, David A. .
JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2009, 27 (06) :444-461
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1999 ASA QUAL PROD R
[6]   Lean Six Sigma and Innovation - an exploratory study among UK organisations [J].
Antony, Jiju ;
Setijono, Djoko ;
Dahlgaard, Jens J. .
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT & BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 2016, 27 (1-2) :124-140
[7]   Readiness factors for the Lean Six Sigma journey in the higher education sector [J].
Antony, Jiju .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY AND PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, 2014, 63 (02) :257-+
[8]   Six Sigma vs Lean Some perspectives from leading academics and practitioners [J].
Antony, Jiju .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY AND PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, 2011, 60 (02) :185-+
[9]  
Argote L., 1999, ORG LEARNING CREATIN, P28
[10]  
Assarlind M, 2013, INT J QUAL RELIAB MA, V30, P387, DOI 10.1108/02656711311308385