Quality assessment in the blog space

被引:5
|
作者
Schaal, Markus [1 ]
Fidan, Guven [2 ]
Muller, Roland M. [3 ]
Dagli, Orhan [4 ]
机构
[1] Bilkent Univ, Dept Comp Engn, Ankara, Turkey
[2] METU Technopolis, AGMLAB Informat Technol, Ankara, Turkey
[3] Univ Twente, Dept Informat Syst & Change Management, Enschede, Netherlands
[4] Bilkent Univ, Dept Comp Engn, Ankara, Turkey
关键词
Information management; Quality assessment; Communication technologies;
D O I
10.1108/09696471011082385
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is the presentation of a new method for blog quality assessment. The method uses the temporal sequence of link creation events between blogs as an implicit source for the collective tacit knowledge of blog authors about blog quality. Design/methodology/approach - The blog data are processed by the novel method for the assessment of blog quality. The results are compared to Google Page Rank with respect to the Gold Standard, the BlogRazzi Bookmark Rank. Findings - The method is similar or better than Google Page Rank with respect to the chosen Gold Standard. Originality/value - The major contribution of this paper is the introduction of a novel method for blog quality assessment. Even though its superiority to other and more established methods cannot be proven in the context of this limited study, it enriches the toolset available for blog quality assessment and may become important for a deeper understanding of organizational learning.
引用
收藏
页码:529 / +
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Quality Assessment in the Cloud: is it worthwhile?
    Marinescu, Cristina
    Petcu, Dana
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 17TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE AND REENGINEERING (CSMR 2013), 2013, : 453 - 456
  • [22] Foveated video quality assessment
    Lee, S
    Pattichis, MS
    Bovik, AC
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MULTIMEDIA, 2002, 4 (01) : 129 - 132
  • [23] Perioperative quality assessment of varicose vein surgeryCommission for quality assessment of the German Society for Vascular Surgery
    T. Noppeney
    M. Storck
    H. Nüllen
    C.-G. Schmedt
    R. Kellersmann
    D. Böckler
    K. Walluscheck
    G. Torsello
    S. Debus
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 2016, 401 : 375 - 380
  • [24] Balneotherapy and quality assessment: Interobserver reliability of the Maastricht criteria list and the need for blinded quality assessment
    Verhagen, AP
    de Vet, HCW
    de Bie, RA
    Kessels, AGH
    Boers, M
    Knipschild, PG
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1998, 51 (04) : 335 - 341
  • [25] QUALITY ASSESSMENT IN IN-VIVO NMR-SPECTROSCOPY .2. A PROTOCOL FOR QUALITY ASSESSMENT
    BOVEE, WMMJ
    KEEVIL, SF
    LEACH, MO
    PODO, F
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1995, 13 (01) : 123 - 129
  • [26] Panoramic radiology quality assessment
    Goldstein, A
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1998, 25 (06) : 1028 - 1032
  • [27] Enterprise Architecture Quality Assessment
    Pankowska, Malgorzata
    PROCEEDINGS OF SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY, ICICT 2022, VOL. 2, 2023, 448 : 39 - 52
  • [28] Quality assessment of an Emergency Department
    David Levarett Buck
    Thomas Osterland
    Thomas Andersen Schmidt
    Søren Wistisen Rasmussen
    Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, 19 (Suppl 2)
  • [29] Institutional Consequences of Quality Assessment
    Rosa, Maria
    Tavares, Diana
    Amaral, Alberto
    QUALITY IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2006, 12 (02) : 145 - 159
  • [30] Perioperative quality assessment of varicose vein surgery Commission for quality assessment of the German Society for Vascular Surgery
    Noppeney, T.
    Storck, M.
    Nuellen, H.
    Schmedt, C. -G.
    Kellersmann, R.
    Boeckler, D.
    Walluscheck, K.
    Torsello, G.
    Debus, S.
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2016, 401 (03) : 375 - 380