PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION OF PATIENTS FOR LIVER RESECTION - APPROPRIATE CT IMAGING

被引:26
作者
KARL, RC
MORSE, SS
HALPERT, RD
CLARK, RA
机构
[1] H LEE MOFFITT CANC CTR,COLL MED,DEPT RADIOL,TAMPA,FL 33682
[2] UNIV S FLORIDA,RES INST,TAMPA,FL 33620
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00000658-199303000-00002
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective The authors determined which combination of computed tomography scans is most helpful for preoperative assessment of patients with liver tumors. Summary Background Data Multi-institutional studies have shown that the most important prognostic factors for selection of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer considered for liver resection are: Dukes' stage of primary tumor, the number of hepatic metastases if greater than 3, the presence of extrahepatic cancer, and the ability to resect tumors with an adequate margin (> 1 cm.) Therefore the ability to predict the presence of extrahepatic disease and the number and location of hepatic tumors are important in these patients. Methods One hundred and nine consecutive patients with evidence of hepatic tumors were evaluated by computed tomography with arterial portography (CTAP) and abdominal computed tomography after a 4-hour delay (CT-D). Results of these studies and conventional computed tomography (CT-C) were compared with findings at operation. Results CTAP proved to be the most sensitive test for assessing distribution of intrahepatic disease. CT-D was no more sensitive than CT-C for the detection of hepatic or extrahepatic disease. Conclusions CT-C in concert with CTAP provides the most reasonable CT evaluation of patients considered for operation for the treatment of hepatic tumors.
引用
收藏
页码:226 / 232
页数:7
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE OF HUMAN COLORECTAL-CANCER METASTASIS
    AUGUST, DA
    OTTOW, RT
    SUGARBAKER, PH
    [J]. CANCER AND METASTASIS REVIEWS, 1984, 3 (04) : 303 - 324
  • [2] COMPARISON OF COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY AND MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING IN THE EVALUATION OF FOCAL HEPATIC-LESIONS
    BARAKOS, JA
    GOLDBERG, HI
    BROWN, JJ
    GILBERT, TJ
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL RADIOLOGY, 1990, 15 (02): : 93 - 101
  • [3] LIVER AND ABDOMINAL SCREENING IN PATIENTS WITH CANCER - CT VERSUS MR IMAGING
    CHEZMAR, JL
    RUMANCIK, WM
    MEGIBOW, AJ
    HULNICK, DH
    NELSON, RC
    BERNARDINO, ME
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1988, 168 (01) : 43 - 47
  • [4] LIVER-TUMOR IMAGING - CURRENT CONCEPTS
    FERRUCCI, JT
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1990, 155 (03) : 473 - 484
  • [5] SURVIVAL AFTER LIVER RESECTION FOR SECONDARY TUMORS
    FOSTER, JH
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1978, 135 (03) : 389 - 394
  • [6] EVALUATION OF FOCAL HEPATIC MASSES - A COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF MRI AND CT
    GLAZER, GM
    AISEN, AM
    FRANCIS, IR
    GROSS, BH
    GYVES, JW
    ENSMINGER, WD
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL RADIOLOGY, 1986, 11 (03): : 263 - 268
  • [7] HEPATIC METASTASES STUDIED WITH MR AND CT
    HEIKEN, JP
    LEE, JKT
    GLAZER, HS
    LING, D
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1985, 156 (02) : 423 - 427
  • [8] HUGHES KS, 1988, SURGERY, V103, P278
  • [9] IWATSUKI S, 1986, SURGERY, V100, P804
  • [10] HEPATIC RESECTION OF METASTATIC COLORECTAL-CARCINOMA - A 10-YEAR EXPERIENCE
    LOGAN, SE
    MEIER, SJ
    RAMMING, KP
    MORTON, DL
    LONGMIRE, WP
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 1982, 117 (01) : 25 - 28