IMPROVED POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA WITH MORPHINE ADDED TO AXILLARY BLOCK SOLUTION

被引:22
作者
BOURKE, DL
FURMAN, WR
机构
[1] Departments of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins Hospital, the Francis Scott Key Medical Center of the Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
关键词
ANESTHESIA; REGIONAL; AXILLARY BLOCK; MORPHINE; OPIOIDS; PAIN;
D O I
10.1016/0952-8180(93)90137-4
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Study Objective: To determine whether the addition of morphine to the axillary block local anesthetic solution provides improved or prolonged postoperative analgesia. Design: Prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial with 24-hour follow-up. Setting: Ambulatory unit of a large academic referral center. Patients: Consecutive healthy volunteers scheduled for elective upper extremity surgery. Interventions: Patients in the treatment group (AX) were given intravenous (IV) saline and had morphine 0.1 mg/kg added to their axillary block solution. Control subjects (CT) received morphine 0.1 mg/kg IV and had saline added to their axillary block solution. All axillary blocks were performed using 0.55 ml/kg of 1.5% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:200,000. Measurements and Main Results: During the first 24 hours after surgery, visual analog scale (VAS) scores, supplementary analgesic (oxycodone 5 mg with acetaminophen 500 mg) use, and complications were recorded. Both groups had similar VAS scores throughout the study. In the 24-hour postoperative study period, AX patients required approximately half as many doses (median, 2 doses; range, 0 to 7 doses of supplemental analgesic as CT patients (median, 4 doses; range, 0 to 12 doses). There were no major complications in either group. Conclusions: The addition Of morphine 0.1 mg/kg to the local anesthetic axillary block solution provided improved postoperative analgesia without an increased frequency of side effects or major complications.
引用
收藏
页码:114 / 117
页数:4
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Stein, Millan, Shippenberg, Peter, Herz, Peripheral opioid receptors mediating antinociception in inflammation. Evidence for involvement of mu, delta, and kappa receptors, J Pharmacol Exp Ther, 248, pp. 1269-1275, (1989)
  • [2] Yaksh, Rudy, Analgesia mediated by a direct spinal action of narcotics, Science, 192, pp. 1357-13578, (1976)
  • [3] Fields, Emson, Leigh, Gilbert, Iversen, Multiple opiate receptor sites on primary afferent fibres, Nature, 284, pp. 351-353, (1980)
  • [4] Prosdocimi, Finesso, Gorio, Enkephalin modulation of neural transmission in the cat stellate ganglion: pharmacological actions of exogenous opiates, J Auton Nerv Syst, 17, pp. 217-230, (1986)
  • [5] Bosnjak, Seagard, Roerig, Kostreva, Kampine, The effects of morphine on sympathetic transmission in the stellate ganglion of the cat, Can J Physiol Pharmacol, 64, pp. 940-946, (1986)
  • [6] Mays, North, Schnapp, Stellate ganglion “blocks” with morphine in sympathetic type pain, J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 44, pp. 189-194, (1981)
  • [7] Sanchez, Nielsen, Heslet, Iversen, Neuronal blockade with morphine: a hypothesis, Anaesthesia, 39, pp. 788-789, (1984)
  • [8] Racz, Gunning, Della Santa, Forster, Evaluation of the effect of perineuronal morphine on the quality of postoperative analgesia after axillary plexus block: a randomized double-blind study, Anesth Analg, 72, pp. 769-772, (1991)
  • [9] Viel, Eledjam, De La Coussaye, Dathis, Brachial plexus block with opioids for postoperative pain relief: comparison between buprenorphine and morphine, Reg Anesth, 14, pp. 274-278, (1989)
  • [10] Bullingham, O'Sullivan, McQuay, Et al., Perineural injection of morphine fails to relieve postoperative pain in humans, Anesth Analg, 62, pp. 164-167, (1983)