INVITRO EFFECTS OF THE IONOPHORE LYSOCELLIN ON RUMINAL FERMENTATION AND MICROBIAL-POPULATIONS

被引:12
|
作者
KUNG, L [1 ]
TUNG, RS [1 ]
SLYTER, LL [1 ]
机构
[1] USDA ARS,BELTSVILLE AGR RES CTR,BELTSVILLE,MD 20705
关键词
IONOPHORES; RUMEN FERMENTATION; RUMEN MICROORGANISMS;
D O I
10.2527/1992.701281x
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Batch and continuous culture techniques were used to evaluate the effect of the ionophore lysocellin on ruminal fermentation and microbial populations. In batch culture, .5 and 1 ppm (of the fluid) lysocellin markedly decreased (P < .01) the acetate:propionate ratio without affecting fiber digestion, ammonia concentration, or culture pH. Greater concentrations of lysocellin had negative effects (P < .05) on fiber digestion and increased (P < .05) culture pH. In continuous culture, a low level of lysocellin (33 ppm of the diet DM or about .7 ppm of the fluid) decreased pH (P < .05) and methane (P < .05) production but had no effect on fiber digestion. Lysocellin tended to increase (P < .05) OM digestion in corn-based diets but decreased OM digestion in barley-based diets (starch source x lysocellin interaction, P < .05). In addition, the molar proportion of propionate was increased more in barley- than in cornbased diets. Total anaerobes and amylolytic and lactate-utilizing microorganisms were not affected by the ionophore. In continuous culture, cellulolytic and lactate-producing organisms were insensitive to lysocellin, but, in lysocellin-treated media, cellulolytic organisms were resistant, whereas lactic acid producers were sensitive to lysocellin at 4 ppm. In summary, the ionophore lysocellin alters ruminal fermentation by decreasing ruminal methane production and increasing the molar proportion of propionate; however, effects varied depending on whether corn or barley served as the primary starch source.
引用
收藏
页码:281 / 288
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] DETERMINATION OF MICROBIAL-POPULATIONS WITH PIEZOELECTRIC MEMBRANES
    ISHIMORI, Y
    KARUBE, I
    SUZUKI, S
    APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1981, 42 (04) : 632 - 637
  • [42] EFFECTS OF LYSOCELLIN ON PERFORMANCE, RUMINAL AND PLASMA CHARACTERISTICS OF GROWING CATTLE
    HARVEY, RW
    SPEARS, JW
    DARDEN, DE
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1988, 66 (04) : 1036 - 1041
  • [43] UTILIZATION OF CHLOROBENZOATES BY MICROBIAL-POPULATIONS IN SEWAGE
    DIGERONIMO, MJ
    NIKAIDO, M
    ALEXANDER, M
    APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1979, 37 (03) : 619 - 625
  • [44] EFFECTS OF MOLASSES FED WITH UREA OR FISH-MEAL ON THE RUMEN MICROBIAL-POPULATIONS AND FERMENTATION IN EARLY WEANED FRIESIAN CALVES
    ELIAS, A
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCES, 1988, 58 (03): : 366 - 371
  • [45] INVITRO EFFECTS OF A THIOPEPTIDE AND MONENSIN ON RUMINAL FERMENTATION OF SOLUBLE CARBOHYDRATES
    TUNG, RS
    KUNG, L
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 1993, 76 (04) : 1083 - 1090
  • [46] Microbial populations and ruminal fermentation of sheep and llamas fed low quality forages
    Ortiz-Chura, A.
    Fernandez Pepi, M. G.
    Wawrzkiewicz, M.
    Ceron Cucchi, M. E.
    Cravero, S.
    Jaurena, G.
    SMALL RUMINANT RESEARCH, 2018, 168 : 47 - 51
  • [47] Effect of Rhodophyta extracts on in vitro ruminal fermentation characteristics, methanogenesis and microbial populations
    Lee, Shin Ja
    Shin, Nyeon Hak
    Jeong, Jin Suk
    Kim, Eun Tae
    Lee, Su Kyoung
    Lee, Sung Sill
    ASIAN-AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCES, 2018, 31 (01): : 54 - 62
  • [48] In vitro evaluation of the effects of essential oils on ruminal microbial fermentation
    Castillejos, L.
    Calsamiglia, S.
    Martin-Tereso, J.
    ter Wijlen, H.
    ITEA-INFORMACION TECNICA ECONOMICA AGRARIA, 2007, : 108 - 110
  • [49] EFFECTS OF A PESTICIDE PROGRAM ON MICROBIAL-POPULATIONS FROM APPLE LEAF LITTER
    ANDREWS, JH
    KENERLEY, CM
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY, 1979, 25 (12) : 1331 - 1344
  • [50] DYNAMICS OF MICROBIAL-POPULATIONS DURING FERMENTATION OF WINES FROM THE UTIEL-REQUENA REGION OF SPAIN
    PARDO, I
    GARCIA, MJ
    ZUNIGA, M
    URUBURU, F
    APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1989, 55 (02) : 539 - 541