INVITRO EFFECTS OF THE IONOPHORE LYSOCELLIN ON RUMINAL FERMENTATION AND MICROBIAL-POPULATIONS

被引:12
|
作者
KUNG, L [1 ]
TUNG, RS [1 ]
SLYTER, LL [1 ]
机构
[1] USDA ARS,BELTSVILLE AGR RES CTR,BELTSVILLE,MD 20705
关键词
IONOPHORES; RUMEN FERMENTATION; RUMEN MICROORGANISMS;
D O I
10.2527/1992.701281x
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Batch and continuous culture techniques were used to evaluate the effect of the ionophore lysocellin on ruminal fermentation and microbial populations. In batch culture, .5 and 1 ppm (of the fluid) lysocellin markedly decreased (P < .01) the acetate:propionate ratio without affecting fiber digestion, ammonia concentration, or culture pH. Greater concentrations of lysocellin had negative effects (P < .05) on fiber digestion and increased (P < .05) culture pH. In continuous culture, a low level of lysocellin (33 ppm of the diet DM or about .7 ppm of the fluid) decreased pH (P < .05) and methane (P < .05) production but had no effect on fiber digestion. Lysocellin tended to increase (P < .05) OM digestion in corn-based diets but decreased OM digestion in barley-based diets (starch source x lysocellin interaction, P < .05). In addition, the molar proportion of propionate was increased more in barley- than in cornbased diets. Total anaerobes and amylolytic and lactate-utilizing microorganisms were not affected by the ionophore. In continuous culture, cellulolytic and lactate-producing organisms were insensitive to lysocellin, but, in lysocellin-treated media, cellulolytic organisms were resistant, whereas lactic acid producers were sensitive to lysocellin at 4 ppm. In summary, the ionophore lysocellin alters ruminal fermentation by decreasing ruminal methane production and increasing the molar proportion of propionate; however, effects varied depending on whether corn or barley served as the primary starch source.
引用
收藏
页码:281 / 288
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION OF MICROBIAL-POPULATIONS FOR BIOREMEDIATION
    LIU, S
    SUFLITA, JM
    TRENDS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY, 1993, 11 (08) : 344 - 352
  • [32] SOIL MICROBIAL-POPULATIONS AFTER WILDFIRE
    VAZQUEZ, FJ
    ACEA, MJ
    CARBALLAS, T
    FEMS MICROBIOLOGY ECOLOGY, 1993, 13 (02) : 93 - 103
  • [33] SOCIAL-BEHAVIOR OF MICROBIAL-POPULATIONS
    OLESKIN, AV
    JOURNAL OF BASIC MICROBIOLOGY, 1994, 34 (06) : 425 - 439
  • [34] Effects of different doses of aflatoxin B1 on the ruminal fermentation parameters and microbial populations of goats
    Li, Fucan
    Peng, Jing
    Wang, Xi
    Shi, Haitao
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2024, 102 : 579 - 580
  • [35] Effects of Flavonoid-rich Plant Extracts on In vitro Ruminal Methanogenesis, Microbial Populations and Fermentation Characteristics
    Kim, Eun T.
    Guan, Le Luo
    Lee, Shin J.
    Lee, Sang M.
    Lee, Sang S.
    Lee, Il D.
    Lee, Su K.
    Lee, Sung S.
    ASIAN-AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCES, 2015, 28 (04): : 530 - 537
  • [36] Manipulating ruminal fermentation: A microbial
    Weimer, PJ
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1998, 76 (12) : 3114 - 3122
  • [37] RETENTION OF CRYPTIC GENES IN MICROBIAL-POPULATIONS
    LI, WH
    MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 1984, 1 (02) : 213 - 219
  • [38] ENUMERATION OF DENITRIFYING MICROBIAL-POPULATIONS IN TURF
    MANCINO, CF
    TORELLO, WA
    PLANT AND SOIL, 1986, 96 (01) : 149 - 151
  • [39] MICROBIAL-POPULATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH REFRIGERATED POULTRY
    GEORNARAS, I
    DYKES, GA
    VONHOLY, A
    SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, 1994, 90 (11-12) : 579 - 582
  • [40] Manipulation of ruminal microbial fermentation
    Galindo, Juana
    Marrero, Yoandra
    CUBAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE, 2005, 39 : 427 - 437