COMPARISON OF 2 METHODS FOR THE DESIGN OF ACTIVE SUSPENSION SYSTEMS

被引:14
作者
DEJAGER, AG
机构
[1] Department of Mechanical Engineering, WH 2.137, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, 5600 MB
关键词
ACTIVE SUSPENSION; LINEAR QUADRATIC CONTROL; H-INFINITY CONTROL; AUTOMOBILE DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.1002/oca.4660120305
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The design of controllers for active suspension systems can be formulated as an optimal control problem. The main objective of the controller is to isolate parts of the system from vibrations in other parts. Additional constraints are limited suspension travel, limited actuator force and good track-holding capability. The objective and the constraints can be used in the formulation of an optimality criterion. Two criteria are examined, with the corresponding LQ and H-infinity control design methods. The methods are compared with respect to their ability to generate a controller that achieves the best performance. For the LQ method three controllers with different structures were generated. To illustrate the use of the design methods, controllers have been designed for a simple but typical suspension system. For this system the controllers based on a quadratic norm perform comparably but the controllers based on output feedback are less robust. The H-infinity controller did not perform well for this problem when the same weighting functions were used to generate the controller as for the LQ method. Use of the H-infinity design method therefore requires careful tuning of the weighting functions. Use of the standard functions is inappropriate.
引用
收藏
页码:173 / 188
页数:16
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
BENDER EK, 1968, T ASME D, V90, P213
[2]   STATE-SPACE SOLUTIONS TO STANDARD H-2 AND H-INFINITY CONTROL-PROBLEMS [J].
DOYLE, JC ;
GLOVER, K ;
KHARGONEKAR, PP ;
FRANCIS, BA .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1989, 34 (08) :831-847
[3]   MULTIVARIABLE FEEDBACK DESIGN - CONCEPTS FOR A CLASSICAL-MODERN SYNTHESIS [J].
DOYLE, JC ;
STEIN, G .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1981, 26 (01) :4-16
[4]  
FRANCIS BA, 1987, COURSE H INFINITY CO
[5]   STATE-SPACE FORMULAS FOR ALL STABILIZING CONTROLLERS THAT SATISFY AN H INFINITY-NORM BOUND AND RELATIONS TO RISK SENSITIVITY [J].
GLOVER, K ;
DOYLE, JC .
SYSTEMS & CONTROL LETTERS, 1988, 11 (03) :167-172
[6]   ACTIVE CONTROLS IN GROUND TRANSPORTATION - A REVIEW OF THE STATE-OF-THE-ART AND FUTURE POTENTIAL [J].
GOODALL, RM ;
KORTUM, W .
VEHICLE SYSTEM DYNAMICS, 1983, 12 (4-5) :225-257
[7]   ACTIVE DAMPING IN ROAD VEHICLE SUSPENSION SYSTEMS [J].
KARNOPP, D .
VEHICLE SYSTEM DYNAMICS, 1983, 12 (06) :291-311
[8]  
Kwakernaak H., 1972, LINEAR OPTIMAL CONTR
[9]   ON THE DESIGN OF ACTIVE SUSPENSION INCORPORATING HUMAN SENSITIVITY TO VIBRATION [J].
LEE, AY ;
SALMAN, MA .
OPTIMAL CONTROL APPLICATIONS & METHODS, 1989, 10 (02) :189-195
[10]   SIMPLIFYING THE H-INFINITY THEORY VIA LOOP-SHIFTING, MATRIX-PENCIL AND DESCRIPTOR CONCEPTS [J].
SAFONOV, MG ;
LIMEBEER, DJN ;
CHIANG, RY .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONTROL, 1989, 50 (06) :2467-2488