We Are the Corporation: Dispersive CSR

被引:9
作者
Ludescher, Jessica Christie [1 ]
Mahsud, Rubina [2 ]
Prussia, Gregory E. [3 ]
机构
[1] Seattle Univ, Business Eth & Philosophy, Albers Sch Business & Econ, Dept Management,Dept Philosophy,Coll Arts & Sci, Seattle, WA 98122 USA
[2] Seattle Univ, Strateg Management, Dept Management, Albers Sch Business & Econ, Seattle, WA 98122 USA
[3] Seattle Univ, Management, Dept Management, Seattle, WA 98122 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-8594.2011.00399.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We contend that the current trend of emphasis on corporate social responsibility (CSR) serves to divert the public's attention from the real ethical issues facing business and society. We extend the scope of social responsibility beyond business corporations to include a range of institutions. We also propose that CSRs be reconceptualized in terms of the ways that managers enable stakeholders to hold themselves and each other responsible for the ways their actions affect each other as they conduct business through the firm. In this article, we propose a new view of corporations and responsibility that reconstrues behavior currently referred to as CSR. Starting with an overview of theories of the firm, we show that the way in which a firm is conceived yields different views on CSR. A shortcoming of the theory of the firm approach to CSR is that it leads us to focus excessively on business corporations at the expense of a broader analysis of other institutional players. These theories also tend to emphasize the obligations of corporations to people rather than of people to each other. We propose that social responsibility be viewed through a systems theory paradigm instead. We then argue that corporations should be construed in terms of the people who impact them. We advance a different conception of business responsibility that is more comprehensive, inclusive, and systemic.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 88
页数:34
相关论文
共 52 条
[31]  
JACKALL R, 1983, HARVARD BUS REV, V61, P118
[32]   THEORY OF FIRM - MANAGERIAL BEHAVIOR, AGENCY COSTS AND OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE [J].
JENSEN, MC ;
MECKLING, WH .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 1976, 3 (04) :305-360
[33]  
Kennedy Robert G., 2006, MARIA LAW J, P1
[34]  
LEVITT T, 1958, HARVARD BUS REV, V36, P41
[35]  
Ludescher JC, 2010, INDEP REV, V15, P123
[36]   Sustainable Development and the Destruction of the Amazon: A Call for Universal Responsibility [J].
Ludescher, Jessica Christie .
ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS, 2011, 33 (02) :197-218
[37]   ALUMNI AND THEIR ALMA-MATER - A PARTIAL TEST OF THE REFORMULATED MODEL OF ORGANIZATIONAL IDENTIFICATION [J].
MAEL, F ;
ASHFORTH, BE .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 1992, 13 (02) :103-123
[38]   Employee voice in corporate governance: A defense of strong participation rights [J].
McCall, JJ .
BUSINESS ETHICS QUARTERLY, 2001, 11 (01) :195-213
[39]   Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective [J].
McWilliams, A ;
Siegel, D .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2001, 26 (01) :117-127
[40]  
Naughton Michael, 2006, AVE MARIA LAW J, P33