COMPARISON OF SUSTAINED-RELEASE FORMULATIONS OF NICARDIPINE AND VERAPAMIL FOR MILD TO MODERATE SYSTEMIC HYPERTENSION

被引:10
|
作者
GRADMAN, AH
FRISHMAN, WH
KAIHLANEN, PM
WONG, SC
FRIDAY, KJ
机构
[1] YESHIVA UNIV ALBERT EINSTEIN COLL MED,BRONX,NY 10461
[2] SW TEXAS METHODIST HOSP,SAN ANTONIO,TX
[3] SYNTEX LABS INC,PALO ALTO,CA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY | 1992年 / 70卷 / 20期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0002-9149(92)90459-C
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
In this double-blind, parallel, multicenter study, sustained-release (SR) preparations of 2 calcium antagonists, nicardipine and verapamil, were compared for the treatment of mild to moderate systemic hypertension. Two hundred eighteen patients with supine diastolic blood pressures (BP) 95 to 114 mm Hg were randomly assigned to receive nicardipine-SR 45 mg twice daily (n = 73), nicardipine-SR 60 mg twice daily (n = 73) or verapamil-SR 240 mg once daily in the morning (n = 72). All 3 regimens significantly reduced supine and sitting systolic and diastolic BPs compared with baseline values (p<0.005). The efficacy of drugs became apparent after 2 weeks of therapy, and was sustained throughout the 12-week study. Reductions in sitting diastolic BP and supine and sitting systolic BPs were statistically greater with nicardipine-SR 60 mg twice daily compared with verapamil, and nicardipine-SR 45 mg twice daily was equivalent to verapamil. Asthenia and constipation occurred more frequently in patients treated with verapamil (9.7 and 11.1%, respectively, compared with 6.8 and 4.1% in either nicardipine group). Adverse events reported more frequently with nicardipine were headache (17.8% with nicardipine-SR 60 mg and 15.1% with nicardipine-SR 45 mg vs 13.9% with verapamil) and edema (15.1% in the nicardipine-SR 60 mg group, 8.2% with nicardipine-SR 45 mg vs 4.2% with verapamil). Verapamil, but not nicardipine, produced significant reductions in heart rate. SR preparations of calcium antagonists offer options for effective monotherapy of systemic hypertension. Side-effect profiles differ and may affect choice of therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:1571 / 1575
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] COMPARISON OF NICARDIPINE AND PROPRANOLOL IN THE TREATMENT OF MILD AND MODERATE HYPERTENSION
    NAUKKARINEN, VA
    KARPPINEN, K
    SARNA, S
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1987, 33 (02) : 119 - 126
  • [32] OVERDOSE OF SUSTAINED-RELEASE VERAPAMIL
    RANKIN, RJ
    EDWARDS, IR
    NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1990, 103 (887) : 165 - 165
  • [33] POISONING WITH SUSTAINED-RELEASE VERAPAMIL
    KOZLOWSKI, JH
    KOZLOWSKI, JA
    SCHULLER, D
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1988, 85 (01): : 127 - 127
  • [34] OVERDOSE OF SUSTAINED-RELEASE VERAPAMIL
    BARROW, PM
    HOUSTON, PL
    WONG, DT
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1994, 72 (03) : 361 - 365
  • [35] DILEVALOL IS COMPARABLE TO VERAPAMIL SUSTAINED-RELEASE IN THE TREATMENT OF HYPERTENSION IN THE ELDERLY
    WRIGHT, J
    DIETZ, A
    GRAY, J
    KAIHLANEN, P
    CIRANGLE, L
    CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1990, 38 (02): : A544 - A544
  • [36] SLOW RELEASE VERAPAMIL AND TREATMENT OF MILD TO MODERATE HYPERTENSION
    AMABILE, G
    HULIN, P
    WAJMAN, A
    SERRADIMIGNI, A
    BORY, M
    THERAPIE, 1989, 44 (04): : 275 - 278
  • [37] INSTANT AND SUSTAINED-RELEASE VERAPAMIL IN THE TREATMENT OF ESSENTIAL-HYPERTENSION
    MIDTBO, K
    HALS, O
    VANDERMEER, J
    STORSTEIN, L
    LAUVE, O
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1986, 57 (07): : D59 - D63
  • [38] SLOW RELEASE VERAPAMIL AND TREATMENT OF MILD TO MODERATE HYPERTENSION
    AMABILE, G
    HULIN, P
    WAJMAN, A
    SERRADIMIGNI, A
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 1986, 4 (05) : 656 - 657
  • [39] SUSTAINED-RELEASE VERAPAMIL VS ATENOLOL IN ESSENTIAL-HYPERTENSION
    MONTGOMERY, T
    FRAZIER, PE
    CASE, J
    DESIMONE, PA
    MCALLISTER, RG
    CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1987, 35 (01): : A9 - A9
  • [40] TREATMENT OF MILD HYPERTENSION WITH LOW ONCE-DAILY DOSES OF A SUSTAINED-RELEASE CAPSULE FORMULATION OF VERAPAMIL
    DAVIS, PJ
    FAGAN, TC
    TOPMILLER, MJ
    LEVINE, JH
    FERDINAND, KC
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1995, 35 (01): : 52 - 58