THERMIDOR IN LAND-USE CONTROL

被引:0
作者
VANSETERS, P
机构
[1] Department of Legal Sociology, Tilburg University
关键词
ACCESS; LAND USE; CALIFORNIA; LEGISLATION;
D O I
10.1080/08920759109362142
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In June 1987, the U.S. Supreme Court in Nollan v. California Coastal Commission held against the California Coastal Commission. Did this legal landmark signal the rise of a new, conservative jurisprudence of takings? And if yes, did that imply the demise of what had been accomplished by the so-called quiet revolution in land use control that swept the country in the late 1960s and early 1970s? The complexities of this case cannot be understood apart from the historical evolution of the Coastal Commission's policies through the 1970s and 1980s, particularly its coastal access policies. Because of these policies the Coastal Commission, since its inception in 1972, has been subjected to all kinds of criticism, but at the same time has been widely praised for its balanced approach. These varying assessments of the role and record of the Commission also underly the conflicting viewpoints and arguments of Justices Scalia, who wrote for the majority in Nollan, and Brennan, who field an extremely strong dissent. The resulting legal uncertainities, added to the political setbacks suffered from a lukewarm legislature and a hostile governor, forced the Commission to temper its assertive mission of maximizing coastal access, at least for the time being.
引用
收藏
页码:253 / 273
页数:21
相关论文
共 33 条
[11]  
De Neufville J., The Land Use Policy Debate in the United States, (1981)
[12]  
Dimento J., Nollan v. Coastal Commission: What Has Scalia Wrought?, Los Angeles Daily J., (1987)
[13]  
Duddleson W., How the citizens of California secured their coastal management program, Protecting the Golden Shore: Lessons from the California Coastal Commission, pp. 3-64, (1978)
[14]  
Epstein R., Takings: Descent and resurrection, Supreme Court Review, pp. 1-45, (1987)
[15]  
Fischel W., Et al., Columbia Law Review, 88, pp. 1581-1794, (1988)
[16]  
Goldstein B., Buccino S., Is the bundle bigger? The legal and practical implications of Nollan v. California Coastal Commission and First English Evangelical Lutheran Church of Glendale v, County of Los Angeles. Stanford Environmental Law Journal, 8, pp. 46-76, (1989)
[17]  
Gughmetti J., Wheeler E., The Taking, (1981)
[18]  
Healy R., Rosenberg J., Land Use and the States, (1979)
[19]  
Heiman M., Coastal Recreation in California: Policy, Management, Access, (1986)
[20]  
Hoff J., Public beach access exactions: Extending the public trust doctrine to vindicate public rights, UCLA Law Review, 28, pp. 1049-1086, (1981)