The right to self-determination versus the obligation to protect one's health

被引:3
作者
Hoefling, Wolfram [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Staatsrecht, Albertus Magnus Pl, D-50923 Cologne, Germany
来源
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAET IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN | 2009年 / 103卷 / 05期
关键词
self-responsibility; obligation to protect one's health; self-determination; Statutory Health Insurance(SHI);
D O I
10.1016/j.zefq.2009.05.002
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Individual responsibility and the abidance by any health-related obligations are key words of the present political and legal German healthcare debate. In the process of adjusting the German welfare state by focussing the ideal allocation of common health resources patients who do not meet their health-related obligations are thus expected to accept cutbacks in medical care services. However, from the perspective of constitutional law there is no health-related obligation deriving from the German constitution - the right to self-determination guaranteed in Art. 2 Sect. 2 Sent. 1 of the German constitution has not been amended to impose a corresponding duty. Hence, health-related obligations may only refer to indirect ways of exercising individual responsibility, no more and no less. The present article highlights the few possibilities which the German constitution provides for the implementation of health-related obligations and reminds us of the conceptual aspects which have to be considered by the legislator.
引用
收藏
页码:286 / 292
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条