THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT SOIL TREATMENT ON THE YIELD AND QUALITY OF SILAGE MAIZE AND SPRING BARLEY IN POTATO-GROWING REGION

被引:0
|
作者
HRUBY, J
PROCHAZKA, F
机构
来源
ROSTLINNA VYROBA | 1992年 / 38卷 / 9-10期
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The research has been aimed at assessing the different technological procedures of soil treatment for silage maize and spring barley in conditions of potato-growing region on sandy loam brown soil in view of yields and technological quality of products. Field trials were established at the station at Stritez near Trebic in 1986 to 1989. The following systems of soil cultivation were tested within the trials performed: - silage maize (1986 to 1988) 1. stubble breaking, manuring, medium-deep tillage (0.10 to 0.12 m); 2. manuring, medium-deep tillage, deep tillage (0.18 to 0.22 m); 3. stubble breaking, manuring, medium-deep tillage, skewed loosening (0.40 m); 4. manuring, medium-deep tillage, skewed loosening; - spring barley (1987 to 1989) I. traditional cultivation - medium-deep tillage (0.18 to 0.22 m); II. minimum cultivation (0.10 to 0.15 m). Forecrop soil cultivation in the spring was identical in all variants. Organic manuring to silage maize was uniform in all variants of soil cultivation. The rate of 40 t per 1 ha of manure was applied. The following indicators were tested in silage maize: green and dry matter yields ( t per 1 ha; feeding characteristics: fibre (%), ashes (%), fat (%), crude protein (N.6.25; %), nitrogen-free extract - BNVL (%), starch value (SH). In spring barley: grain yields (t per 1 ha), number of plants (per m2), number of spikes (per m2), 1000-kernel weight - HTZ (g), screening on 2.5 mm mesh sieves (%), crude protein content in grain (N.6.25; %). The data obtained were processed statistically by variance analysis and minimum significant difference D(T) was calculated. The yield response of silage maize to different intensity of soil cultivation and elimination of stubble breaking was statistically insignificant (Tab. I). A similar conclusion is referred by H r u b y, P r o c h a z k o v a (1990) in the conditions of sugar beet-growing region. Contrary to this, the effect of different soil cultivation in more arid conditions of maize-growing region (Prochazkova, Hruby, 1989) was statistically significant. The technological procedures used for soil cultivation to silage maize bad not more significant influence on studies feeding characteristics in dry and green matter(Tabs II and III). Statistically significant difference was found only in fat content in spadix when the highest value was observed in the variant with stubble breaking, manuring and medium-deep tillage. Silage maize was followed with spring barley in which, except direct effect of different soil cultivation on the grain yield and some indicators of its technological quality residual action of studies technological procedures of soil cultivation to forecrop was studied, i.e. to silage maize (Tab. IV). It followed from the results that different intensity of soil cultivation to spring barley had no significant effects on the grain yield. An analogous conclusion is referred to also by e.g. H r u b y (1987) in the conditions of maize growing region and H u d c o v a (1990) refers to the data of sugar beet-growing region. The highest grain yield was recorded in the variant 1 (only with medium-deep tillage) when evaluating the yield responses of spring barley to the forecrop. 1000-kernel weight and screening on 2.5 mm mesh sieves were analyzed out of mechanically determined grain indicators which were very balanced in view of soil cultivation to spring barley and to forecrop, as well. In spite of insignificant difference in crude protein content (N.6.25) in spring barley grain among variants, the tendency towards lower content at lowered intensity of soil cultivation was confirmed. The decreases amounted to 0.22 % on an average in minimization in comparison with medium-deep tillage.
引用
收藏
页码:853 / 859
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] MONOCULTURE SILAGE MAIZE GROWING WITHOUT SOIL CULTIVATION AND WITH DIFFERENT NPK FERTILIZATION LEVELS
    SIMON, J
    ROSTLINNA VYROBA, 1979, 25 (09): : 979 - 988
  • [32] Grain quality and yield of spring barley in field trials under variable growing conditions
    Vanova, M.
    Palik, S.
    Hajslova, J.
    Buresova, I.
    PLANT SOIL AND ENVIRONMENT, 2006, 52 (05) : 211 - 219
  • [33] EFFECT OF DIFFERENT LEVELS OF SOIL COMPACTION ON YIELD OF SILAGE CORN
    HAKIMI, AH
    KAHCRU, RP
    AGROCHIMICA, 1976, 20 (2-3): : 239 - 245
  • [34] Effect of different soil treatment methods and weed control on microbiological properties of soil and potato yield
    Klikocka, H
    Stöven, K
    Schnug, E
    LANDBAUFORSCHUNG VOLKENRODE, 2003, 53 (04): : 209 - 215
  • [35] INFLUENCE OF THE INTENSITY OF SOIL CULTIVATION AND PREVIOUS CROPS ON THE YIELD AND QUALITY OF SPRING BARLEY
    SUSKEVIC, M
    PROCHAZKA, V
    ROSTLINNA VYROBA, 1987, 33 (05): : 471 - 479
  • [36] DYNAMICS OF INORGANIC NITROGEN IN THE SOIL AND ITS INFLUENCE ON THE YIELD AND QUALITY OF SPRING BARLEY
    LOZEK, O
    BIZIK, J
    FECENKO, J
    ROSTLINNA VYROBA, 1991, 37 (05): : 441 - 451
  • [37] EFFECT OF DIFFERENT SOIL CULTIVATION ON THE UPTAKE OF NUTRIENTS BY SPRING BARLEY
    PETRICKOVA, N
    ROSTLINNA VYROBA, 1979, 25 (09): : 925 - 932
  • [38] THE INFLUENCE OF METEOROLOGICAL FACTORS ON THE YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS IN SPRING BARLEY GROWN IN AN INTENSIVE BEET-GROWING REGION
    HUBIK, E
    ROSTLINNA VYROBA, 1983, 29 (07): : 753 - 760
  • [39] Effects of precipitation variability and conservation tillage on soil moisture, yield and quality of silage maize
    Niu, Lili
    Qin, Wangfei
    You, Yongliang
    Mo, Qishun
    Pan, Jie
    Tian, Lihua
    Xu, Guang
    Chen, Chao
    Li, Zhou
    FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2023, 7
  • [40] DIFFERENT YIELD EFFECT OF NITROGEN IN PRODUCTIVE GENOTYPES AND VARIETES OF SPRING BARLEY
    KLUSAK, H
    ROSTLINNA VYROBA, 1989, 35 (09): : 949 - 956