Finding an academic home for fundraising: a multidisciplinary study of scholars' perspectives

被引:6
作者
Mack, Catherine E. [1 ]
Kelly, Kathleen S. [2 ]
Wilson, Christopher [3 ]
机构
[1] Cross Int, Pompano Beach, FL USA
[2] Univ Florida, Dept Publ Relat, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[3] Brigham Young Univ, Sch Commun, 360 BRMB, Provo, UT 84602 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1002/nvsm.1554
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The high-demand, high-paying field of fundraising does not have an academic home in higher education, which hampers fundraising research and education. Recent advances in fundraising education and research can be attributed to four different disciplines: public relations, marketing, nonprofit management, and higher education administration. This disjointed approach has impeded the empirical study of fundraising, the development of theory in the field, and the education of future fundraisers. The purpose of this study is to begin the process to scientifically identify an appropriate academic home for fundraising that benefits fundraising practice, advances scholarship, and strengthens America's nonprofit sector. In-depth interviews were conducted with 15 scholars from multiple disciplines who had published articles on fundraising in the three major nonprofit management and philanthropy journals. Findings show that there is no consensus among scholars about whether fundraising belongs in public relations, marketing, or nonprofit management. Although this study found no consensus among fundraising scholars about the appropriate academic home for fundraising, it does identify areas of agreement and disagreement on pertinent topics and provides a benchmark to guide further discussions about locating fundraising within an academic discipline. Copyright (C) 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:180 / 194
页数:15
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, INT J ED ADV, DOI DOI 10.1057/PALGRAVE.IJEA.2150013
[2]  
Association of Fundraising Professionals, 2014, REP MAJ FUNDR SEE SA
[3]  
Bell J., 2013, UNDERDEVELOPED NATL
[4]  
Broom G. M., 2009, CUTLIP CTR EFFECTIVE
[5]  
Burnett K., 2002, RELATIONSHIP FUNDRAI
[6]  
Caboni TC, 2007, ANN C ASS STUD HIGH
[7]  
Cant MC, 2004, ESSENTIALS MARKETING
[8]  
Daniels A, 2014, THE CHRONICLE
[9]  
Dolch N. A., 2007, NONPROF VOLUNT SEC Q, V36, p28S
[10]  
Donahue JA, 1995, ETHICS ASKING DILEMM, P57