STRENGTH OF THE PIN-BONE INTERFACE OF EXTERNAL FIXATION PINS IN THE ILIAC CREST - A BIOMECHANICAL STUDY

被引:0
作者
LIU, J
LAI, KA
CHOU, YL
机构
[1] NATL CHENG KUNG UNIV,DEPT ORTHOPED,TAINAN 70101,TAIWAN
[2] NATL CHENG KUNG UNIV,INST BIOMED ENGN,TAINAN 70101,TAIWAN
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The iliac crest is a frequent insertion site for external fixation pins in treating unstable pelvic or acetabular fractures and in iliofemoral distraction for superiorly dislocated hips. The pin-bone interface is critical for the success of treatment, but studies of the iliac crest are lacking. The purpose of this study was to investigate the strength of the pin-bone interface of different pins and different insertion methods. Four types of commercial pins, Wagner pins, Orthofix cortical and cancellous screws, and AO pins, were driven into sheep iliac crests by 2 methods: the intercortical and the transcortical. Specimens were tested for pullout and bending with an Instron testing machine (Model 1343) at a extension rate of 0.02 mm/sec to failure. The results revealed that the intercortical method had a stronger pullout force than the transcortical in all types of screws (p < 0.05), probably caused by longer insertion in the bone. In the pullout tests, the Wagner pins were the strongest and the Orthofix cancellous screws were the weakest. There were no differences in bending. In the iliac crest, the intercortical method was the better way of driving pins, and the new Orthofix screws were not proven to be stronger than the Wagner pins, nor were the cancellous screws more suitable than the cortical ones.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 244
页数:8
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
ARO HT, 1989, CLIN ORTHOPAEDICS, V248, P246
[2]   THE MECHANICAL PERFORMANCE OF THE STANDARD HOFFMANN-VIDAL EXTERNAL FIXATION APPARATUS [J].
BRIGGS, BT ;
CHAO, EYS .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1982, 64 (04) :566-573
[3]   EXTERNAL FIXATION OF UNSTABLE PELVIC RING FRACTURES - COMPARATIVE RIGIDITY OF SOME CURRENT FRAME CONFIGURATIONS [J].
BROWN, TD ;
STONE, JP ;
SCHUSTER, JH ;
MEARS, DC .
MEDICAL & BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING & COMPUTING, 1982, 20 (06) :727-733
[4]  
CHAO E Y, 1981, Orthopaedic Transactions, V5, P259
[5]   RIGIDITY AND STRESS-ANALYSES OF EXTERNAL FRACTURE FIXATION DEVICES - A THEORETICAL APPROACH [J].
CHAO, EY ;
KASMAN, RA ;
AN, KN .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1982, 15 (12) :971-&
[6]  
CHAO EYS, 1988, ORTHOPEDICS, V11, P1057
[7]  
CHAPMAN JR, 1992, ORTHOP T, V17, P406
[8]   The Oxford External Fixator: fixator stiffness and the effects of bone pin loosening [J].
Churches, A.E. ;
Tanner, K.E. ;
Harris, J.D. .
Engineering in Medicine, 1985, 14 (01) :3-11
[9]   A STUDY OF EXTERNAL SKELETAL FIXATION SYSTEMS FOR UNSTABLE PELVIC FRACTURES [J].
DAHNERS, LE ;
JACOBS, RR ;
JAYARAMAN, G ;
CEPULO, AJ .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1984, 24 (10) :876-881
[10]  
DEBASTIANI G, 1987, J PEDIATR ORTHOPED, V7, P129